Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: re_nortex

The airwaves would be pretty useless if they weren’t regulated.

He chose two obvious but flawed analogies with his “wind” and “sun”.

How about “airspace”? What would commercial flight look like if there was no public control over it? How about roads — what would driving look like if the “public” wasn’t allowed to set any rules about driving on the roads, or off the roads for that matter?

What about water? There are a lot less rules, but what if water was considered a private matter, and you couldn’t control what your neighbor pumped down his well and put in “his” section of the water table?

Or what if you couldn’t stop your neighbor from damming up the stream and taking all the water before it made it to your farm?

We can argue about how much and what type of regulation is needed for the electromagnetic spectrum, but it would be wrong-headed to argue that there should be no regulation of the spectrum — it would be useless.


4 posted on 05/03/2011 2:11:58 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT; In Maryland
We can argue about how much and what type of regulation is needed for the electromagnetic spectrum, but it would be wrong-headed to argue that there should be no regulation of the spectrum — it would be useless.

What I recall from history (studied very long ago), it was Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover who created the forerunner to the FCC, then known as the FRC (Federal Radio Commission) in the 1920's. I believe the intent was solely focused on the allotment of the spectrum which had descended into chaos when everyone was firing up their own transmitters on frequencies of their choosing.

What's not clear in this proposal is if the deregulation would be confined solely to content. In my opinion, an unfettered, marketplace-oriented environment for content would be ideal with the caveat being that each owner must behave responsibly for what is limited spectrum space.

Therein lies the rub in deregulation. Just who gets those slices of the valuable, scare spectrum? That "public interest" argument, unfortunately, has been used to advance the diversity rules of ownership and even the revocation of a license in the (in)famous Red Lion vs. FCC case decided by the Warren court.

6 posted on 05/03/2011 2:33:29 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Well put.


8 posted on 05/03/2011 2:35:38 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
A traffic cop is one thing but the traffic cop does not control your destination or who is riding in your car.

The FCC should be strictly limited to enforcing frequencies. The "license" should be issued at cost and then resold on an open market.

10 posted on 05/03/2011 3:05:18 PM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson