Great for her family but she took an oath to the "STATE", and she didn't fulfill it.
Oh, she fulfilled her oath, she just didn’t complete her term. Now, are you going to answer the question of whether or not you would have stayed on even if it hurt the state?
Exactly what are the words to this 'oath'? Was it not to serve the people, and I am sorry using the liberal idol word state really makes your argument impotent. Maybe you have forgotten, it is 'we the people' that are the state not a fixation on an inanimate liberal icon.
Great for her family but she took an oath to the "STATE", and she didn't fulfill it.
_______________________________________
Question...
If concern for her family's finances (which is not the excuse she most often used) was enough to get her to quit as governor, then what would be enough to get her to quit as POTUS?
You are arguing religion with Moonies. They live in a Sarah can do no wrong fantasy. The rest of the country sees quitting for what it is.
As for her excuse, BOR asked her about it and she said absolutely nothing about the lawsuits or her finances. The excuse she gave him was that she was a lame duck (with a year and a half left) and didn't want to put the people of Alaska through having a lame duck governor.
Which leads to another question...
Since Palin quir to avoid being a lame duck with a year and a half left as governor, why would we expect her to finish a full term as POTUS?