Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MamaTexan

Smack! So Wong Kim Ark does NOT dispute Vattel/Natrual born? “Native born” instead of “natural born”. Anti-certifigaters have been parroting a lie?

[Repeating your link]

United States v. Wong Kim Ark (No. 18)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html


199 posted on 05/02/2011 7:48:55 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Anti-certifigaters have been parroting a lie?

Honestly, I could say. I guess I haven't been keeping up. LOL!

The point is.... a court can ONLY see the particulars before it, and Arks issue before the court clearly states he is petitioning as a NATIVE born citizen.

Ark does nothing to define natural born.

206 posted on 05/02/2011 8:07:45 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson