Okay, so now you admit that you did post those snippets in defense of Reagan's pro-life abortion record.
I don't know if that gets you back your integrity on this forum. But for me, you're still acting like an idiot.
That’s not what you said. LOL...
You and I have stood together on this forum time and time again, in defense of Reagan signing the 1967 Therapeutic Abortion Act.
And I responded that I never defended him signing the act. Which is true. And you started calling me a liar.
It's all up the thread. This thread. It's not like it's in some deep dark archive. LOL...
Hey, let’s get down to brass tacks, shall we?
Where do YOU stand, right now? That’s what I would like to know.
1) Is the child a person, from the first moment of their biological creation?
2) Does the Constitution of the United States imperatively require the equal protection of the unalienable right to life of every single person?
After all, even Blackmun, in Roe v. Wade, openly admitted that if the fetus is a person, of course they are protected under the explicit provisions of our Constitution.
If you say they’re not a person, you agree with Blackmun.
If, (as I believe, based on all common sense and modern science) they are a person, does that not make Congressman West’s position unconstitutional, as I have been asserting all along on this thread?