You and I have stood together on this forum time and time again, in defense of Reagan signing the 1967 Therapeutic Abortion Act.
And I responded that I never defended him signing the act. Which is true. And you started calling me a liar.
It's all up the thread. This thread. It's not like it's in some deep dark archive. LOL...
The paragraph in full:
"You and I have stood together on this forum time and time again, in defense of Reagan signing the 1967 Therapeutic Abortion Act. We both know that law was abused by the California medical community. At the same time, Reagan did say, it was his biggest mistake made as Governor."
That paragraph speaks for itself. Its one FULL statement and had more to do within the context of what happened in the aftermath of Reagan signing the legislation then anything else. That is the defense I was talking about. Maybe it got lost in all the arguing.
Upon reading that, in RE#37 you immediately became indignant with me. I never defended Reagan signing the legislation into law and have posted that on this thread. Again, it was a mistake by Reagan. Why would I take issue with you not defending him in that same context?
There is no doubt in my mind, however, you went after Reagan to make Cong West look bad. That is a cheapshot and more typical of what I expect from malcontents. Not from good conservatives. You didn't need to use Reagan to make your points against West. That is wrong and you know it.