Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: Politics4US
Mark’s great guy agree or disagree his love for this country is deep and it is that to which why i look up to him.
To: Politics4US
I think Mark is brilliant, and agree with him 90% of the time, but he’s wrong about this.
59 posted on
04/12/2011 6:30:39 PM PDT by
Nepeta
To: Politics4US
well he could still be a “documentor”....
seems to me if the ‘bamster could be found a fraud....at minimum we could nullify the 2 SCOTUS he appointed....
with Obama-care being a bonus.....
61 posted on
04/12/2011 6:33:01 PM PDT by
sbark
To: Politics4US
What is particularly disappointing with Levin's stand is that he is a Constitutional lawyer. What has always dumbfounded me on this issue is that eligibility to hold office or qualify for any job must always be the premier threshold issue. There are lots of other subordinate concerns with Obama, but anyone who looks at the matter logically should conclude that you deal with preliminary matters first before you jump forward to the other issues. Why on earth would someone who constantly professes the importance of our Constitution dismiss this mandate so flippantly?
To: Politics4US
What is particularly disappointing with Levin's stand is that he is a Constitutional lawyer. What has always dumbfounded me on this issue is that eligibility to hold office or qualify for any job must always be the premier threshold issue. There are lots of other subordinate concerns with Obama, but anyone who looks at the matter logically should conclude that you deal with preliminary matters first before you jump forward to the other issues. Why on earth would someone who constantly professes the importance of our Constitution dismiss this mandate so flippantly?
To: Politics4US
Truth is not always pragmatic.
To: holdonnow
I’ve been hoping you would give the definition of a “natural born citizen”.
Disappointing that you have chosen not to address the question.
77 posted on
04/12/2011 6:58:11 PM PDT by
kanawa
(Obama - "The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.")
To: Politics4US
I think Mark is a fantastic conservative, but I strongly disagree with him on this matter. He is one of the strongest voices for our side.
79 posted on
04/12/2011 7:06:07 PM PDT by
sand88
To: Politics4US
While I don’t agree with Mark on this (Obama most certainly has NOT established his eligibility), I do agree with Mark and a few other conservatives and some freepers here that the eligibility issue probably will not be the reason Obama is removed from office. If he is removed, it will most likely be via the ballot box in 2012.
The state of the economy should be front and center in the lead-up to the 2012 elections. We are perilously close to an economic meltdown in the country and Obama along with the leftists in the Senate have demonstrated that they cannot (or will not) do anything to fix the problems we have. In fact, their proposed “solutions” and actions will exacerbate the matter.
While the eligibility issue is important to a lot of us, the state of the economy is the one issue around which all freedom loving, economically literate Americans must unite before it’s too late.
To: Politics4US
Mark thinks that the issue is just not going anywhere. He believes we should put our energy and efforts into a constitutional amendment to limit government spending to a percentage of the GDP. Mark fails to realize that the dims don't care what the constitution says. They do what they please. So even if we are successful with the balanced budget amendment the dims will never follow it. The crux of the birther issue is reestablishing the constitution as the supreme law of the land and to re enforce that there are consequences for ignoring the constitution. Mark is a brilliant man and a great conservative. He knows Obama is not eligible. He simply thinks the issue isn't important and is not win able. In this he is wrong. This issue is about lawless disregard for the constitution and the rule of law. It is the culmination of decades of subversion, mendacity, and treason aimed at the destruction of the constitution and our republic. Mark is only now beginning to realize the depth of the evil we face. If Obama is not eligible then he must resign. It is incumbent upon Obama to produce his BC. He cannot of course. Even the state of Hawaii couldn’t find it. By forcing this issue the constitution can be reestablished as the supreme law of the land. And we can send the marxists packing. Obama must comply with the requirements of the constitution. As a citizen I demand that you, Obama, prove your eligibility for the office of the president.
84 posted on
04/12/2011 7:49:05 PM PDT by
Nuc 1.1
(Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
To: Politics4US
The birth certificate issue only scratches the surface. There is the stolen SSN, the suppressed college records, the trip to Pakistan, and on and on.... With all due respect to Mark, I really think he is missing the boat on this one. The day of reckoning is coming... Sooner rather than later.
85 posted on
04/12/2011 8:13:46 PM PDT by
Xeroes80
("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."- EH)
To: Politics4US
The eligibility issue is all about the constitution, Mark Levin is obvious not.
93 posted on
04/12/2011 9:18:44 PM PDT by
blockhead51
(Oust the Evil Socialist Usurper!)
To: Politics4US
Tonight while talking about Trump, Levin said the birther movement gets us nowhere, and he has no part of the movement. He also said he will have his administrator delete comments on his facebook criticizing him for this. This sure is evidence of what a real tower of strength Mark Levin is. Ignoring this CONSTITUTIONAL issue reveals Mark to be more of a tower of jelly.
By the way, Mark Levin is a Freeper. His user name is "holdonnow". So while he may be able to scrub critical comments on his Facebook account, he will not be able to do that here on Free Republic.
What a wimp, eh?
96 posted on
04/13/2011 6:04:43 AM PDT by
JohnG45
To: Politics4US
I stopped listening to him a long time ago.
He's the legal expert. So why doesn't he do a detailed analysis, as he did for the 2000 election. If i missed it, then apologies.
Sounds like he was hushed up or something. It's very disappointing. I feel betrayed.
Thanks for all responses and flames in advance.
99 posted on
04/13/2011 6:42:50 AM PDT by
cvq3842
To: Politics4US; All
Lame Cherry Reply to Mark Levin
“Mr. Levin should be bright enough to know this, but perhaps arrogance or hanging around with Limbaugh has dulled his common sense. The point is the Birther issue IS THEE most vital of issues as it is part of an ecompassing strategy and is viable, because it works.
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/
To: Politics4US
This guy wrote a whole book about the Supreme Court? Yet he feels The Constitution is of minimal importance??
109 posted on
04/13/2011 6:40:26 PM PDT by
Yaelle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson