Replies

If it makes no difference that a circumcised penis IS easier to keep clean and that a circumcised penis is more pleasing aesthetically (and boys don’t need to feel ‘different, but fit in with their peers) then how about this:

UNCIRCUMCISED MEN ARE ABOUT TWICE AS LIKELY TO BE INFECED WITH HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV) AND PASS IT ALONG TO SEXUAL PARTNERS, RESULTING IN HIGHER CERVICAL CANCER RATES in regions where the majority of men are uncircumcised [source: Infectious Diseases Society of America].
It also appears that circumcision helps protect against infection from chlamydia and syphilis [source: JAMA
http://www.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=circumcision.htm&url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081007172820.htm

Recent studies have shown that circumcision can dramatically reduce the rate of HIV infection. According to these studies, A CIRCUMCISED MAN IS 60 percent LESS LIKELY TO CONTACT HIV than an uncircumcised man [source: Timbert].
http://www.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=circumcision.htm&url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081007172820.htm

(This holds true only in the case of female-to-male transmission — circumcision hasn’t been seen to influence the rate of male-to-male HIV transmission [source: JAMA].)
http://www.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=circumcision.htm&url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081007172820.htm

_________________

Mayo Clinic
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/circumcision/MY01023/DSECTION=why-its-done

>Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. The overall risk of urinary tract infections in males is low, but these infections may be more common in uncircumcised males.
Severe infections early in life can lead to kidney problems later on.

>Prevention of penile problems. Occasionally, the foreskin on an uncircumcised penis may be difficult or impossible to retract (phimosis). This can also lead to inflammation of the foreskin or head of the penis.

>Decreased risk of penile cancer. Although cancer of the penis is rare, it’s less common in circumcised men. In addition, cervical cancer is less common in the female sexual partners of circumcised men.

>Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections. Safe sexual practices remain essential, but circumcised men may have a lower risk of certain sexually transmitted infections — including HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

> If it makes no difference that a circumcised penis IS easier to keep clean and that a circumcised penis is more pleasing aesthetically (and boys don’t need to feel ‘different, but fit in with their peers) then how about this:...

Let's agree on a number of fairly obvious true things, many of which you stated or implied:

Circumcision removes a part of the body that is a normal functional organ. The foreskin is the only non-regenerative body organ that is regularly, ritually removed in otherwise civilized modern countries (although I've read arguments for tonsils along the same lines).
An uncircumcised foreskin is more trouble to clean than than a bald dickhead (the unprotected glans). Young boys must be taught how to do it, and before that, their parents have to clean it for them.
An unclean foreskin is very likely to accumulate smegma that a bald dickhead will not. Smegma, a combination of shed cells, oils, and moisture, provides lubrication for the glans and helps keep it clean, but also can act to accumulate bacteria. Smegma is normal and nutural, but too much, hanging around for too long, is a problem.
Risk of picking up, carrying, and transmitting diseases under the foreskin is statistically significant.
If you have a foreskin, it is very important to keep yourself clean.

Every single study that concludes that removing the foreskin is more healthy than leaving it alone, ALSO concludes that it is NOT the foreskin tissue itself that is the problem, but rather the area under it, which tends to accumulate excess smegma if you don't keep it clean.

So, DUH, keep it clean. Yeah, we all agree that keeping it that clean is a pain in ... neck.

Regardless of the health argument, my point was:
LEAVE IT ALONE UNTIL THE OWNER OF THE FORESKIN DECIDES IT'S TOO MUCH TROUBLE TO CLEAN IT AND WANTS IT REMOVED.

That's all. It's a simple matter of personal privacy and liberty regarding one's own body.

I will never understand why you pro-circumcision folks, especially conservatives, can't see that simple point. Oh, well.