Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Varda

>>Vancouver is a given because Canadian viewers don’t count in the ratings.

I don’t know how things work up in Canada, but don’t they also have ratings? Any Canadian team means big ratings in that country and they are hockey mad as it is. I still think (overall) from the NHL’$ per$pective, SJ-TB is the worst possible final.


146 posted on 05/13/2011 9:20:03 AM PDT by Betis70 (Bruins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: Betis70

Vancouver means big ratings for the Canadian network, a network whose contract with the NHL is never in jeopardy and pays consistently well. A Canadian finals in theory means mediocre ratings for VS and NBC, networks whose contracts with the NHL are constantly in jeopardy and currently don’t pay that well (pretty sure the NBC contract still has no up front money and is all revenue sharing).


147 posted on 05/13/2011 9:25:08 AM PDT by discostu (Come on Punky, get Funky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: Betis70

I’ve been reading about the NHL’s TV deals for a few months, Bettman’s comments etc.. As I understand it, the ratings the NHL dies for is the American market. That’s why the winter classic is American teams only. Canada is a separate but saturated small (34 million person) market.


151 posted on 05/13/2011 12:41:44 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson