If you use something, you should pay for it. Who do your think pays for a “public park”?
Dogs cost extra expense, so it appropriate, fair, and efficient to have users pay. Why should some people have to pay to support other people’s pets?
“There is no such thing as a free lunch.” — Milt Friedman
If you use something, you should pay for it. Who do your think pays for a “public park”?
Dog owners pay, It is in the form of licensing fees for our dogs. You pay nothing. Problem is the libs take the money and put it to things like paying for sex change operations for city employees.
Then they look for something else to tax.
Fine, as long as you put meters on the swingsets, and require permit fees for the benches. Since joggers are slower than roller bladers, let’s charge them less per hour, with bicycles paying a super premium for the paths.
Of course, we’ll need to add dozens of new union employees to issue the permits and enforce the new taxes. That will stimulate the economy. So I guess you and Obama would be on the same side on this one.
How much do you contribute to FR?