To: teg_76
Its not 78.4B..........Boehner is playing games with the numbers. Its 78.4B from what Obama originally proposed last year for this fiscal year. Its only a 38B cut from what was spent last year. Thanks for the explanation. I've seen Dems bandy that $70b number about, even a Dem said that since Obama agreed to $70b and GOP wanted $60b, Obama wanted more cuts!! ... Only in Dem-world is a spending level less than some fantastic increase that you never enacted a 'cut'.
The GOP side has been using the $40 b number, and that is more like the real cut number, since its a real cut from the levels of last year.
61 posted on
04/08/2011 10:17:57 PM PDT by
WOSG
(Carpe Diem)
To: WOSG
You have to remember they already had 6 continuing resolutions that cut over 12 billion already. That comes in at around 52 Billion over all. from previous spending levels.
Boehner did as well as can be expected. I am still no fan. He and the Republicans in general are much too diplomatic. ‘Scumbag’ is about as close to civil as I could muster whenever commenting about Reid Or Obama. Than again I am not a politician.
67 posted on
04/08/2011 10:30:58 PM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: WOSG
My daughter wanted a pony when she was four. She did not get the pony. I saved several thousand dollars. When she was 14, she wanted a MacBook Pro; I saved several more thousand dollars. This year, she wanted a new sports car; I'm going to save $45,000. This is the logic by which this EPIC FAIL becomes a HUGE WIN. Unfortunately, it doesn't flow any cash.
I wish Speaker Boenher a BIG WIN like this the next time the caucus votes for leadership.
99 posted on
04/09/2011 1:06:20 AM PDT by
FredZarguna
(It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. In leather.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson