Posted on 04/07/2011 7:03:44 PM PDT by Jess Kitting
According to the Honolulu Advertiser, a "son" was born to "Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama" (Sr.) on August 4, 1961. That's all it says. No more; no less.
See the birth announcement here.
Barack Obama Sr. was married at the time to Kezia Obama from Kenya.
America, here are the real "Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama," legally man and wife in 1961:
The Honolulu Advertiser birth announcement raises many more questions than it answers.
1. How does Stanley Ann Dunham fit into the picture?
2. Was 18-year old Ms. Dunham really married to Barack Obama Sr. as well?
3. If so, was Mr. Obama Sr. a bigamist, married to two women at the same time?
4. Did Ms. Dunham agree to "adopt" Barack Sr. and Kezia's child and claim it as her own in order to get the child into the country?
5. Since no name for the "son" is given, how can Barack Obama Jr. (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro), say that he is indeed the infant mentioned in the Honolulu Advertiser?
6. Where did the birth actually take place, i.e. at which hospital?
7. Who was the attending physician / midwife?
And to make it even more interesting, the Seattle address for ANNA OBAMA is where Mary the ‘baby-sitter’ said she looked after the child of ANNA when her own daughter was 18 months old.
Mary’s daughter was born in July 1959. So she baby-sat in JANUARY 1961. Mary changed her story later! - when it was pointed out to her that was IMPOSSIBLE!
Mary also NEVER said the woman she baby-sat for was Stanley Ann Dunham, and she never named the child. THAT IDENTIFICATION WAS MADE BY CHARLETTE LE FEVRE:
http://www.seattlechatclub.org/News.html
“She recalls as best she can the dates she baby sat Barack as her daughter was 18 months old and was born in July of 1959 and that would have placed the months of baby sitting Barack in January and February of 1962”
(DO THE MATH! 18 MONTHS ADDED TO JULY 1959 = JANUARY 1961!!!!)
“During our first interview, Mary referred to Stanley Ann Dunham as ³Anna² not knowing that it was the same name as what was listed in the Seattle City Directory. This verified for us that indeed Mary had known Ann Dunham. Anna was obviously confident enough with Mary to have her baby sit her son Barack and confide in her about her future plans. Mary strains to remember the days back over forty five years ago and relates that she did not know why Anna was in Seattle but remembers she was ³anxious to get back to her husband². ³She told me they would be going to Kenya when she finished her education which she had promised her parents when she had married, but because her husband had an obligation to his tribe she realized he would have to take another wife that was a full blooded Kenyan². Mary commented that ³I don¹t think I could have been that brave.² “
I REPEAT WHAT CHARLETTE LE FEVRE WROTE:
“During our first interview, Mary referred to Stanley Ann Dunham as ³Anna² not knowing that it was the same name as what was listed in the Seattle City Directory. This verified for us that indeed Mary had known Ann Dunham.”
MARY REFERRED TO THE WOMAN SHE BABY-SAT FOR AS ANNA BECAUSE THAT WAS THE NAME OF THE WOMAN SHE BABY-SAT FOR!
WHO WAS ANNA OBAMA? WHO WAS BORN IN JANUARY 1961?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2458646/posts?page=147#147
Have a good look at the images on this comment and then come back and tell me he looks like Frank Marshall Davis!
THERE IS NO RESEMBLANCE WHAT-SO-EVER.
Obits for Stanley Armour and Stanley Ann
Indexed at the HI State Library site. So far I have been unable to find a copy of either.
Publisher: HONOLULU ADVERTISER
Date: 1995 11 17
Page: D6
Title: DUNHAM, STANLEY A; AKA ANN DUNHAM SUTORO
Subjects: OBITUARIES - D
Subjects: OBITUARIES - D
Or macaca.
Did Ms. Dunham agree to “adopt” Barack Sr. and Kezia’s child and claim it as her own in order to get the child into the country?
________________________
WHAT?? and no, hell no. Barry the Muslim Marxist Halfrican is almost white with kinky hair. Sr. was black and so was Kezia and I do mean BLACK. No way is Soetoro their sun unless he has done some serious bleaching of his skin.
SON, not sun, need a cup of coffee . :)
Nope. It doesn’t. It’s just one more anomoly as to why he needs to release his information.
Go back to your hole.
Not necessarily.
Social Security numbers are issued for anyone, regardless of birth, who applies with adequate documentation. That includes immigrants, refugees, etc.
Place of birth is not a consideration.
Absolutely.
It’s too late — and it would be too disruptive and too drawn-out — for the Supreme Court to intervene.
But the states can stop Obama in his tracks by blocking his run for re-election if he can’t document who he is and where he came from.
An original copy of the Honolulu paper could contain the Obama baby announcement and still prove nothing other than that a male baby was born. No place of birth, no mother’s name, no legit address for the parents.
Trying to use a tiny 50-year-old newspaper ad as proof of identity is absurd.
The paper owners claim they didn’t keep the original issues. Sure, and I have some ocean front property for sale in Arizona.
Obama doesn’t bleach, he tans.
And he has to work at it.
I believe that’s one reason he spends so much time on the golf course and at the beach and why he doesn’t want photos of him with his shirt off.
He has tan lines.
Hard to stay fake-black with an office job.
Politicians have egos. That would certainly give him face time long into the future.
Surely, somewhere along the past 40-some years it would have slipped out that he was X’s son. If so many knew or even suspected, it would have gotten out. People talk. People brag. People gossip.
no puddin’ can have too much proof: http://israelinsider.net/profiles/blogs/is-obama-the-secret-son-of
Scroll down about 2/5th of the page to “Reminiscences” and read the letters from Seniors’ friends. None knew about Ann much less a baby.
http://cambodiana.org/MainreasonsofmysupportofObama.aspx
Very interesting no mention of Ann in any of the musings of Senior’s friends at the time he should of been proud and bragging of his new wife and baby.
Great find.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.