Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PzLdr
Indeed, except for the Scythians [who the Persians had been fighting since the time of Cyrus the Great [they killed him]in the southern Steppe, there weren’t a lot of people around up that way [the great migrations started later] for the Persians to fight. And not much [wealth, ports, etc] to fight over.

I disagree with that -- the Persians had to initially fight off the Babylonians and the Medes and prior to that the all-powerful neo-Assyrian Empire had been defeated.

Beside the Scyths, the Persians had to contend with powerful Indian dynasties and the Egyptians

and wealth -- there was a lot of it in the fertile crescent, indus valley and Canaan.

45 posted on 04/07/2011 7:16:30 AM PDT by Cronos (OPC teaches covenant succession - their kids are saved regardless whether they are Christian or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

You’re right. But the thrust of the article, as I understand it, posits a Persian thrust to the northwest of Greece, at a time when the Babylonians, Assyrians and Medes had already been assimilated into the Persian Empire. So I wrote accordingly.

One other factor the Persians would have faced with the Romans was spectacularly deep manpower pool that was largely homogeneous and higly militarized using the same system [see Second Punic War].


49 posted on 04/07/2011 7:31:09 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson