Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SonOfDarkSkies
"Here's a link to the "fake" conclusion"

I hadn't read far enough before I asked for a link. Sorry!

13 posted on 04/03/2011 10:41:23 AM PDT by Spunky (Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky
No prob. Here's an interesting excerpt from Christianity Today...
Scholars Doubtful About Metal Plate Documents' Authenticity

Other Bible scholars and archaeologists contacted by Christianity Today were equally skeptical. "Don't get too excited until we know what we have," said Darrell Bock, Research Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary. Archaeologists pointed out that any ancient item discovered out of context faces huge hurdles before it can be authenticated and properly dated.

Then on April 1st, no less, the blog Paleojudaica posted a letter from Oxford University lecturer Peter Thonemann, which identified the text from one page of a codex as a crude reproduction of an inscription from an ancient tombstone that has been on display in an Amman museum for the past half century. "The only possible explanation is that the text on the bronze tablet was copied directly from the inscription in the museum," Thonemann wrote.


14 posted on 04/03/2011 10:46:48 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson