I figure if no one has done so already, it is high time we do so now.
1 posted on
03/31/2011 1:55:30 PM PDT by
Tom Hawks
To: Tom Hawks
As chief executive, is bound by the Constitution to protect the States from invasion. Article IV, Section 4
2 posted on
03/31/2011 1:57:09 PM PDT by
Loud Mime
(If it is too stupid to be said, people will listen to it, if sung - - Voltaire)
To: Tom Hawks
The Communist Party of USA manufactured and paid for Obama.
They are the target, unearth their society and you cut the puppetmasters strings.
3 posted on
03/31/2011 1:57:47 PM PDT by
Eye of Unk
("These people are either at your neck or at your knees" A quote by Winston Churchill)
To: Tom Hawks
Knowingly faking his Birth and citizenship. Fraud and conspiracy.
To: Tom Hawks
5 posted on
03/31/2011 1:59:08 PM PDT by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Tom Hawks
Sending the US military to war against another country without the consent of Congress.
6 posted on
03/31/2011 1:59:53 PM PDT by
snowrip
(Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
To: Tom Hawks
8 posted on
03/31/2011 2:01:05 PM PDT by
massmike
(DADT repeal: the Boy Scouts now have tougher membership requirements than the Army!)
To: Tom Hawks
Running a shadow government with czars.
10 posted on
03/31/2011 2:01:29 PM PDT by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Tom Hawks
12 posted on
03/31/2011 2:04:47 PM PDT by
FrankR
(The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
To: Tom Hawks
Well he could never be convicted if he was charged with patriotism.
To: Tom Hawks
the man is a pathological LIAR!! that alone is enough
17 posted on
03/31/2011 2:08:35 PM PDT by
fish hawk
(R. Emmett Tyrrell: Liberalism is dead. What we see now is "soft Nazis-ism".)
To: Tom Hawks; dagoofyfoot; Lucky9teen; Gadsden1st; Chuzzlewit; blackdog; SonOfDarkSkies; wizard61; ...
Impeach now ping. Please let me know privately to be on or off.
I’d think his felony trading presidential appointments for political gain should be on it, as well as his racially-determined application of justice, non-compliance with the laws he’s sworn to uphold, seemingly intentional destruction of America’s Gulf oil industry while awarding business to Brazil’s, and now ‘kinetic military action’ without even the pretense of Constitutional consultation with Congress.
18 posted on
03/31/2011 2:09:17 PM PDT by
OldNewYork
(Impeach now. Make the dream a reality.)
To: Tom Hawks
Ignoring valid court orders such as the one ruling ObamaCare unconstitutional on its face and then ignoring the ruling overturning the drilling moratorium and subsequent contempt citation from that judge.
23 posted on
03/31/2011 2:25:30 PM PDT by
Emperor Palpatine
(Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!)
To: Tom Hawks
Add these
- Disobeying court orders with regard to issuing oil drilling permits.
- Approving sexual assaults in Airports by TSA employees.
25 posted on
03/31/2011 2:27:37 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: Tom Hawks; OldNewYork
Such lists have been circulating on the internet. There are presently 50-100 offenses, some political and several perhaps rising to impeachment level.
All of the latter would require the cooperation of various federal agencies under the control of the O admin (think here of the stalling, resistance and outright obstruction of the Clinton Dept of Justice). Any of the offenses would require a good amount of time for case preparation, perhaps longer than the time remaining in this term. And then there would be the socialist controlled Senate who would view the issues as political in nature “not rising to the level”, etc.
If the current Congress does not have the political testosterone to simply ask HI for birth documents, which could provide a slam-dunk case for removal, what basis is there for believing it would undertake a more difficult process?
I think as a matter of historical record, the U.S. has been screwed by politicians at the highest level who refused to honor their oaths of office. Earlier Americans would have certainly marked that as a turning point.
31 posted on
03/31/2011 2:30:44 PM PDT by
frog in a pot
(We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
To: Tom Hawks
If any part of the rebel force in Libya is Al Queda then wouldn't that be aiding and abetting known enemies of the nation? I would call that treason.
To: Tom Hawks
He doesn’t have any...
Because you cannot impeach an illegitimate president.
You can arrest him for fraud and treason though.
Plenty of those to list.
44 posted on
03/31/2011 3:17:56 PM PDT by
Safrguns
To: Tom Hawks; Nachum
FReeper Nachum has THE list.
51 posted on
03/31/2011 3:26:50 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
To: potlatch
52 posted on
03/31/2011 3:27:41 PM PDT by
devolve
(. . . . . . . . . . . . The $3.59/gal. gasoline is too damned high! . . .)
To: Tom Hawks
I think the first and foremost impeachable offense for any elected official is breaking their oath to uphold the laws of our Constitution. Clearly the Obozo is guilty as hell for that offense as are most other elected officials in DC.
They have manipulated themselves into a protected class thus have no fear of being removed from office mid term and that needs to change and there is only one way to change that mind set.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson