[dynachrome]

Words fail me. That the question should even be asked....

[omega4179]

Wheres the option for stop aiding Al Queda immediately?

[dynachrome]

Thanks to GopherBroke for this one! Is the Obamanation floating a trial balloon about putting American forces under foreign command?

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

[cubreporter]

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

[Billthedrill]

Well, I voted Yes, because we've just learned that the U.S military contains an insufficient number of gays, lesbians, transgenders, communists, anarchists, Satanists, Muslims, muggers, buggerers, and car thieves in high command. We should place that racist organization under a more politically correct leadership like the Arab League.

Man, if I need a sarcasm tag on that...

[apoliticalone]

US Forces shouldn’t even be in Libya, Iraq or Afghanistan. If those in charge can’t put forth a clear mission statement that includes the clear cut goal and an exit strategy that is fully comprehendable by even E2 grunts we shouldn’t be there. We didn’t learn diddly squat from Vietnam where we lost 58K US servicemen spent trillions in today’s dollars and gained nothing of value for the USA.

Today we trade and vacation in Vietnam as if nothing ever happened. War is bull crxp as Gen. Smedley Butler (most decorated ever) to paraphrase once said

No service man should ever be sent into combat unless the POTUS and Congress and profiteering business interests lead the charge. Allow them to establish the beach head and then young Americans may follow.

Most of the Presidents want war but only because they want a room in their library to display their accomplishments. Most are gutless elites.

[BykrBayb]

All of our troops have been under foreign command since January 20, 2009. If you don’t like it, you must be a racist. /s

[combat_boots]

Black Hawk Down Redux anyone? Or, how about this? Warning: GRAPHIC. “U.S Soldier dragged through Mogadishu”

http://iconicphotos.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/mogadishu.jpg?w=300&h=420

[elteemike]

You are absolutely correct...It is absurd the question should even be asked...Google “Michael New”...

The poll already presumes the US should be taking part in the military action as a given, without the option of a “Hell, NO! We don’t belong there in the first place”, or in Iraq or Afghanistan either...

The ground work for this UN interventionism was laid by the NWO or one-worlder “progressives” in WWII, and began in earnest in Korea...

And notice that in cooperation with the UN, the US has failed to decisively “win” in every encounter since...

With the US bearing the brunt of fighting and paying the largest share if not all the bill...

US Out of The UN, and UN out of the US, ASAP!

[Gator113]

No – Even in a coalition, American forces should always be under American command. 77.38%

Yes – We don’t always need to be leading the charge. 17.01%

Don’t know – Can our military refuse an order from a foreign commander? I’m confused. 2.72%

Don’t care.1.43%

Other (post a comment).1.46%

Total Votes: 61,083