Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
Unless and until an actual birth certificate demonstrating that parentage surfaces, legally it's just hearsay...

Actually it's not. There's a legal principle of "presumption of legitimacy" that goes back to the Middle Ages and beyond. The child of a married woman is legally presumed to be legitimate.

33 posted on 03/15/2011 10:10:55 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep

“the unsubstantiated claim that he was born in Hawaii”


39 posted on 03/15/2011 10:44:02 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Actually it's not. There's a legal principle of "presumption of legitimacy" that goes back to the Middle Ages and beyond. The child of a married woman is legally presumed to be legitimate.

There are POP (Presumption of Paternity) Laws in most states that maintain that ANY child of a marriage is the Husband's legal child. Having said that...we don't know that Obama Senior and Stanley Ann were ever married. I have been married and divorced twice and in NEITHER divorce were I or my ex's asked to produce evidence of a marriage license, marriage certificate...anything at all. And still divorces were granted. I seriously doubt they were married and since Senior WAS ALREADY married, his and Stanley Ann's marriage would have been null and void anyway.

121 posted on 03/16/2011 4:07:44 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson