Who's Your Daddy?

Youtube ^ | March 15, 2011 | Chatter4

[chatter4]

Great video. Who's Your Daddy? Obama-Who's Your Daddy? Jack Cashill reviews four of the possible fathers of Barack Hussein Obama on the Andrea Shea King show. There is a lot of information given which many may not have heard before.

[Fred Nerks]

FITS THE BILL FOR WHAT?

I hope you mean the sitepest.

[jamese777]

Rasmussen was one of the most accurate polls in the last election. It is not always the most accurate...

Since when, troll? Rasmussen polls have been among the most accurate in every single election in which they have published polling data. Don’t post lies that you cannot back up!

That’s why I like to use a composite...

You continue to ignore the fact that 22/3.1 is greater than a magnitude of 7! When you include those totally inaccurate numbers in a composite, then you are looking at inaccurate data. So how about not posting your propaganda here? We don’t need your 11% here!

---

And I should care what you need, why?

All anyone need do is look at the volatility in the Rasmussen Presidential Approval Index (and the regular Rasmussen job approval rating) to see why I prefer to use the realclearpolitics.com composite rankings.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history

[Natural Born 54]

Except that two of them have over-sized chins.

[Fred Nerks]

Right...now you see what I mean?

They were a perfect fit! If the Dunhams had been short and fat with receeding chins, they would have needed to find another family...

But keep in mind, Stanley Armour KNEW who ANNA OBAMA was. She’s there with the kenyan and Stanley Armour on the dock. They didn’t add all those fake lei for no reason. If that’s the kenyan she’s standing beside, they have their arms around each other.

Is she the same girl as ANNE/USA? Her image at the Nachmannofs is too distorted to tell.

But one thing is for certain: NEITHER OF THEM ARE IMAGES OF STANLEY ANN DUNHAM.

[Jedidah]

I understand what you’re saying and think there’s something karma-like happening with the confluence of genetics, photography, and the internet.

Maybe they’ll get away with it, but truth may win.

[LucyT]

Jedidah wrote:

"The question is what was required in Hawaii in the mid-1960s."

Fred Nerks' answer:

"I might be able to provide a clue ... if the only bc he had to provide him with an ID belonged to the child of the kenyan and Anna Obama, that document would have shown a brithdate in January, 1961. - That date did, in itself not provide a problem at the time, but what WOULD HAVE BEEN A PROBLEM is that the document showed the mother’s MAIDEN NAME - and it wasn’t Stanley Ann Dunham.

[snip]

Fred Nerks continuing:

"If anyone ever wondered about the background to the ‘BOMFORD’ forgery, there’s your answer. "It was dated to suit the requirements for the ‘fantasy divorce’ - no court was going to give custody to Stanley Ann Dunham unless she was shown as THE MOTHER.

"The Bomford document, as a template for the forgery established both a new birthdate and changed the name of the mother.

"Can I prove it? No. Not any more than anyone else can prove Stanley Ann Dunham gave birth to a child in August 1961."

Read more at # 119 , - then # 122 , # 125 , # 127. All of this is connected to # 136.

[Fred Nerks]

And it’s not just in looks either, MX gave his last address in the middle east before he was assassinated, at the same Cairo University in which zero made his FIRST speech overseas.

In Memoriam?

[Fred Nerks]

I can’t see what karma has to do with it, a dozen or so freepers have spent many hundreds of hours on RESEARCH!

Truth can only WIN through dedicated support IMO.

[Jedidah]

I agree wholeheartedly that rigorous and dedicated research has brought all this to light, and you lead the pack of FReseachers.

Thank you.

I don’t believe in “karma” per se — too idolatrous a concept for a Christian to accept — but the word does convey the idea that sometimes evil catches up with its perpetrators. So forgive me if I didn’t explain myself well.

In this case, “karma” — for lack of a better word — is a reference to the unpredictable and stunning physical likeness that threatens to undo the myth, despite decades of diligent effort in creating it.

[Fred Nerks]

OK...understood. You can fool some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time...but you can’t fool ALL OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME.

HIS TIME IS UP!

[Natural Born 54]

Here's a frame from the chin video showing how traits, like chins, will often skip a generation:

 

[Brown Deer]

All anyone need do is look at the volatility in the Rasmussen Presidential Approval Index...

Keep showing your ignorance troll. The average daily volatility is only 1.28! Compare that to Gallup's volatility of 1.36 and they even use a 3 day moving average.

why?

I have absolutely no idea why you would believe that communism is morally superior to the U.S. system of politics and economics. I almost feel sorry for pathetic people like you.

[bgill]

To be exact the plot of land was lot 9. It was mentioned by a former resident it was the second house in from the Mercer Republican corner.

Please explain the corner Mercer/Republican address. Mercer and Republican corners are 2-3 miles from the 516 E. 13th Ave address.

The 13th Ave. address is a sports field for Seattle University (not U of W).

The Mercer and Republican area is commercial. Interesting is that on the corner is the Queen Anne Community School and the Bill Gates Foundation Headquarters.

Can't tell if that house was at either address.

[bgill]

he most resembles his grandfather.

No, not in the least.

[Natural Born 54]

Speaking of chins, I've wondered what SAD might really look like without that awful chin and jaw - if she indeed existed. She might have been attractive:

 

[GGMac]

Your thinking may be mostly theory - but it does fit, and to your scenario I would add some frosting for the cake: attitude.

As Barry relates in “Dreams From My Father”, his mother, grandmother, and particularly his grandfather just loooooved the statutory rapist, Barack the elder. Gramps couldn’t get enough of the guy - drinking buddy, pal of pals - wonderful, intelligent, sonorous-voiced, terrific sense of humor, just an all around fabulous, anti-racist guy! They all had just the greatest admiration for Barack. He was sometimes a weeee bit - uhh - impatient with people who didn’t appreciate his excellent wonderfulness - but no matter. That wonderfulness always won them over in short order. And of course the little family wholeheartedly and with supreme dedication thoroughly educated the child Barry in his birthright - his inherited not-to-be-disputed legacy of perfect, excellent wonderfulness, you-are-to-be-worshipped blackness. This is truly the theme of the first 62 pages of Barry’s disjointed book. The Gramps idolizes Barack meme is evident in a photo posted on this thread of a group of people departing Hawaii - including Barack, off to his studies at Harvard - and right beside Barack to see him off is the smiling, happy BFF of Barack, Stanley “Gramps” Dunham!

By page 62 of “Dreams”, Barry had returned alone [August 1971] to Hawaii, and was living with his grandparents: [emphasis mine]

“Nestled in the soft, forgiving bosom of America’s consumer culture, I felt safe; it was as if I had dropped into a long hibernation. I [the adult Barry speaking] wonder sometimes how long I might have stayed there had it not been for the telegram Toot found in the mailbox one day.”

“Your father’s coming to see you,” she said. “Next month. Two weeks after your mother gets here. They’ll both stay through New Year’s.”

“She carefully folded the paper and slid it into a drawer in the kitchen. Both SHE AND GRAMPS FELL SILENT, THE WAY I IMAGINE PEOPLE REACT WHEN THE DOCTOR TELLS THEM THEY HAVE A SERIOUS, BUT CURABLE ILLNESS. FOR A MOMENT THE AIR WAS SUCKED OUT OF THE ROOM, AND WE STOOD SUSPENDED, ALONE WITH OUR THOUGHTS.”

“Well,” Toot said finally, “I suppose we better start looking for a place where he can stay.”

“Gramps took off his glasses and rubbed his eyes. “SHOULD BE ONE HELL OF A CHRISTMAS.”

What happened to the looooove?

The various tellings of the Barack visit - including Barry’s recounting in “Dreams”, and the Christopher Andersen telling in “Barack and Michelle” - have the visit’s duration at one month, or four weeks, ending with “...through New Years”.

The FOIA document release of Stanley Ann’s pessport records tells a different story, however, in that Stanley Ann departed Jakarta Oct. 20, 1971 on Pan Am Flight 812 and arrived in Honolulu October 21, 1971. According to Barry [”Dreams”], Barack was to arrive two weeks later, which would have been appx. Nov. 4, 1971. That means Barack’s Hawaii visit was not one month/four weeks, but was TWO months/FOUR weeks. Of course, it’s possible that Barack - who’d not seen his son in more than 10 years - just didn’t care to spend any more time with him than the month. There were many other people he’d not seen is just as long, and who apparently meant more to him than his son. That callousness, combined with Barry’s lie as to how long his father was there, give even more credibility to your [bluecat6] basic theory at the least.

As an aside regarding motivation for Barry to return to Hawaii to live, it had been in the works for at least a year. On page 58 of “Dreams” Barry speaks of the summer [of 1971] drawing to a close, and of him being restless to start at Punahou. He tells of what an accomplishment it was for him to get in; that he’d been considered only because of the intervention of Gramps’s boss - and that therefore, “MY FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, it seems had little to do with race.” That’s “first” - as in, there were further affirmative action experiences later in his life. I thought he accomplished everything with his brains!!

It was 1971 that he returned to Hawaii, was accepted into and started at Punahou. Again on page 58 of “Dreams”, Barry states: “I had gone for several interviews with Punahou’s admissions officer the previous summer”. That would have been the summer of 1970. That date is confirmed on page 54 of “Dreams”: When Barry has just been picked up by Gramps and Toot at the Honolulu airport [Aug. 1971], he’s fretting to himself that he’ll be living with strangers. Then he recalls that when his mother told him he would be returning to Hawaii, that she would try to make it there for Christmas - and, “She reminded me of what a great time I’d had living with Gramps and Toot just the previous summer - the ice cream, the cartoons, the days at the beach.” Considering that photo labeled 1969 of Barry with the little Japanese boy in third grade - one has to wonder just how long the “previous summer” might have actually been.

[Fred Nerks]

CHINNY CHIN CHIN! look who takes after her grandfather!

[Natural Born 54]

I’ve got some parcel maps I’ll dig out to show you where this property is located.

First off, that address does not exist any more. The building was torn down in the mid 1980’s. Lot 9 and several other lots were amalgamated into one large new lot and an apartment building was erected on the site.

Seattle streets are very screwy and to compound how confusing they are when looking at this Capitol Hill address is that fact that in 1961 Seattle re-oriented all the streets in the area so that that address was designated as “East”. Prior to ‘61, it was “North” or “No.” which was the way to express it back then. The property card that was displayed at some of the web sites along with the supposed photo of the old building on lot 9 actually had the address both ways. The top card that they showed with the articles had the address as “East”. The supplemental cards from the city archive, such as the one on the garage, still had the address as “North.”

The platt or block that contains lot 9 is bounded by 12th Ave. E., 13th Ave. E., E. Republican St. and E. Mercer St.

I thought that crossed out Mercer was quite odd. If Charlette typed “Mercer” but meant to type “Republican” why didn’t she just backspace and erase “Mercer”? No, instead she went to the trouble of using html to show “Mercer” crossed out. I’ve pondered that and it makes no sense but was obviously quite deliberate on her part.

Another odd thing is that Google Maps will display an address if you type in the old address of the building formerly on lot 9 - the 516 address - even though it NO LONGER EXISTS.

I’ll go find that map now.

[Fred Nerks]

Stanley Ann Dunham, Zero and Madelyn. There's nothing fake about this image...without images such as these, the myth could not have been created.

[Natural Born 54]

Here's the street map showing the current layout of the block and the property - I added a small photo of the building that's there now: