Dealing with Internet Trolls - the Cognitive Therapy Approach
Thanks, Fractal Trader.
Posted on 03/07/2011 7:23:48 PM PST by Fractal Trader
ping
A soft word turneth away wrath. Bide your time and you’ll get your shot at an effective ambush. Take the battle to his home and destroy all his friends in his sight.
ping
Best way to deal with trolls is to ignore them.
The list given here seems more applicable to how to give responses on anything, anywhere, to anyone.
Treat the other person with respect. Compliment them, if you can. Ask questions rather than force your own opinion. No personal attacks.
Sorry, that technique doesn’t work in the realm of politics, not without a LOT of time and a LOT of disruption of the forum, not to mention compromising on issues.
We’re not here to be an open forum. We’re here to be a conservative forum. Jim or one of his trusted mods throw the hammer, and Trolls ride the lightning.
Aw, come on - it’s more fun to play with the trolls -keeps you on your toes and it burns calories...
Yeah, I remember one troll who compared Jim Rob to Hitler. I have a feeling that reasoning and politeness would’t go very far on that one...
(Sound of BtD's flameproof hatching closing quietly...)
Daggone it, Drill, that’s “ACP”, not “APC”, and it’s “hatch”, not “hatching”. And yer a Nazi. A gay Nazi from outer space. Yeah.
Dealing with Internet Trolls - the Cognitive Therapy Approach
Thanks, Fractal Trader.
A NOOBS GUIDE TO POSTING ON FR
Relax: don’t worry if you don’t get everything exactly right.
Communicate clearly: write in the best spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalisation, idiomatic speech, etc. that you can, no matter how bad anyone else’s posts are.
It may be a good idea to avoid too high or complicated words, because many foreign speakers of English often have poor English vocabulary. Use words that suit the level of the discussion and the poster you are commenting to.
Don’t let the way a poster says something get in the way of the information. If their way of saying something is objectionable, others will likely help you deal with that poster.
Avoid logical fallacies: I.E. Don’t outwit yourself. It’s all on record, so it’s too easy to prove exactly what you said.
Especially avoid ad hominem: “You’re under age and much younger than me and not a lawyer, so you’re not qualified to give your opinion about open-source licences.” Assuming you really know anything about the person on the other end of a post is just silly.
Be polite and friendly.
Don’t be too terse. Write coherently, and explain what you want.
Proper human communication has a lot of redundancy, but people prefer it this way. Even in Information Theory, you cannot compress an arbitrary amount of data to a message which is too short.
On the other hand, don’t be too verbose, as people won’t bother reading you. THE LESS YOU SAY, THE MORE EASILY IT IS COMPREHENDED. It may be better to put a claim and reiterate.
Don’t selectively trim the message without leaving enough context. Remember, people other than the person you post to are reading as well.
Don’t mis-interpret or jump to conclusions - ask the other poster what he/she means if you don’t know.
Try to avoid using aphorisms, proverbs, “famous” quotes, rhymes or verse etc. Instead use free-form, coherent speech and say what you want in your own words.
The problem with aphorisms, and their ilk are that they tend to project authority, and usually backfire because a person intuitively knows that.
Sometimes they may lead to an aphorism war or for “correcting” the aphorism or discussing its larger context and origins.
All of these can sometimes spice up a friendly conversation and add humor to it, though, but your mileage may vary.
Don’t make fun of another poster, unless it’s a consensual exchange. Respect others and try to avoid unnecessary humor, especially the below the belt kind of humor. Be pleasant - not funny.
Don’t be rude; use soft words such as “I think”, “I believe”, “In my opinion”, “I find that”, etc., when giving your opinion, and facts when you are actually quoting facts from a source.
Don’t label: Unless you like being labeled back.
If possible, thank a poster for responding to you, or providing the opportunity to respond to him. If the poster’s responses are well written, acknowledge that, even if you don’t agree with what it says.
These things go a long way towards providing good communication on an Open Forum Website.
Darlin’,
Trolls are kitteh food.
We plays wif dem...
(sometimes using all or some of your above advice,)
before we preys on dem...
and den we let loose wif da lightnin’
and voila!
Crispy critters!
(Witch are bery good wif mustard.)
Extoll the ex-troller! Spoken from experience.
What’s this about shooting .45 ACP? Is this bad or good? I read some people writing about “stopping power” or “knockdown power” as if a 9mm wouldn’t stop someone.
Personally I think if I got shot with a .22, I’d try to leave the premises ASAP, I don’t think I would want to wait around for the heavy artillary.
Are 9mm’s and .38’s still OK or better than nothing?
It’s nothing at all, I’m only trolling. And nobody is biting. Dang it. ;-)
Oh posh. Trolls are made for teasing. Kitteh is right.
Nah, zot him ..... lol
kitty power ... purr purr ... hzzzzzzzz
I had a ex-NYPD guy tell me that a .45 to the earlobe is a wound. While a .22 to center mass will create a mass card.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.