Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Eligigbility Conference by Supreme Court
Vanity | 03/06/2011 | NEVERBLUFFER

Posted on 03/06/2011 2:10:17 PM PST by neverbluffer

Does anyone have any information as to what transpired with the Supremem Court conference yesterday regarding Obama's eligibility?

I have seen nothing and cannot even find information, even on Freerepublic...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: birth; certifigate; chicagomob; eligibility; harvardresumefraud; hawaii; kagan4resumefraud; kaganresumefraud; naturalborncitizen; noaccountability; nobc; nobirthcertificate; nodocumentation; nointegrity; nojustice; nomoreamerica; notransparency; notruth; noveritas; obama; resumefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: Gena Bukin

Odd. #’s 58 and 59 are missing What did 59 say and where did it go?


61 posted on 03/07/2011 8:22:12 AM PST by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: charlie72

SCOTUS denies re-hearing for Hollister vs Barry Soetoro. See ScotusBlog.com.


62 posted on 03/07/2011 8:51:03 AM PST by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverbluffer

Obama Eligibility Appeals at the Supreme Court of the U.S.

1) Berg v Obama (denied)
2) Beverly v F.E.C. (denied)
3) Craig v. U.S. (denied)
4) Donofrio v Wells (denied)
5) Herbert v Obama (denied)
6) Hollister v Soetoro I (denied)
7) Hollister v Soetoro Rehearing (denied)
8) Kerchner v Obama (denied)
9) Lightfoot v Bowen (denied)
10) Rhodes v MacDonald (denied)
11) Schneller v Cortes (denied)
12) Taitz v Obama (sanctions affirmed)
13) Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz (denied)


63 posted on 03/07/2011 9:30:50 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Is anyone really shocked? Disappointed, sure, but even surprised? I’d like to post a few comments I made last night. They will mean nothing to the non-believers among us, but I trust the Christians will take heart:

“I’m not expecting a plug nickle from the Supremes. They’ve given us the finger too many times already.”

“[It doesn’t] hinge on SCOTUS. I’ve thought for a long time that the key is Obama’s poll numbers. I don’t trust any of the pollsters—not even one—but after a certain point even they can’t cover for the slide. The rise in gas prices and inflation were inevitable, given Obama’s policies. His numbers are on the way down, and this time they won’t rally. I believe God will cause the right situation to arise at just the right time. We may have to wait a bit yet, but the day of reckoning is coming.”

“I hope I’m too cynical where SCOTUS is concerned. The whole Obama situation has jaundiced me toward the courts. Fortunately, we don’t rely on the courts. God is our ultimate hope, and I still trust Him to pull a rabbit out of the hat when we need it most. In that sense, I’m the last cynical of all, because no matter to what degree the institutions of man let us down, God never will.

Obama has been a lot of things, but lawless is foremost among them. You no doubt know what the Bible has to say about lawlessness. God will deliver us from this regime. It may not be on our preferred time table, but it will happen at the perfect time. That is my firm belief.

I wish I could infuse all of FR with a wave of optimism. Our future doesn’t depend on seven or nine people in black. God has resources at His disposal these people never dreamed of. After however many temporary setbacks, we will prevail. Meantime, we have God’s peace to see us through. A good deal all around. :)”

Bottom line: we’re doing just fine. Obama is riding for a fall any way you slice it. His popularity is slipping, and when it hits a certain point, we’ll start seeing what we want to see. Till then, ignore the SP and keep your focus on Providence. God sees every detail of the future, which is why His time-line is not ours. His is perfect, though, and we’ll frankly be amazed and awed when we see it finally play out.


64 posted on 03/07/2011 9:55:31 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
Is anyone really shocked? Disappointed, sure, but even surprised?

I would be shocked if any court got involved in these questions.

The Supreme Court sees a House of Representatives that is controlled by the opposition and that can, at any time it wishes, subpoena the Hawaiian birth records. If the GOP doesn't want this issue pursued, how can anyone expect the Supreme Court to become interested?

65 posted on 03/07/2011 9:59:36 AM PST by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Gena Bukin

“Rehearing denied. No comment.”

Thanks Gena.

As I have said before, we are no longer a Constitutional Republic.

God Help Us.


66 posted on 03/07/2011 10:02:54 AM PST by Joe Marine 76 (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick

It’s all about timing. There are still too many people invested in Obama. When the suffering, from high gas prices, unemployment, inflation, etc., hits a certain point, things will start to shake loose. It’s hard to be patient but it pays off. We will see Obama crumble over the next two yeas. 2012 will not be kind to those who have been derelict in their duties, but it will be very kind to those who kept he faith and didn’t give in to discouragement.


67 posted on 03/07/2011 10:04:38 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: All; Admin Moderator

Why was the “’Birther’ Bill Is Fringe Of The Fringe” thread pulled?


68 posted on 03/07/2011 10:08:28 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw; melancholy

The OP turned out to be a leftie troll. Melancholy has the details, if you need more.


69 posted on 03/07/2011 10:25:52 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Yes, I don’t give a =f=bomb= who jabber was. I want the content of three replies I made on that thread back. The editorial was real in a real paper in Nebraska, the Journal Star. See http://journalstar.com/news/opinion/editorial/article_896f2493-dd7d-5ed6-9261-8e36ef8e6fa5.html


70 posted on 03/07/2011 10:28:52 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: bvw

I was surprised the entire thread blew up too. Usually the mod inserts a small, innocuous ‘zot’, and then lets us dance on the troll’s internet grave for a while. I have no idea why the entire thread went down memory hole. I’d have enjoyed reading the incriminating posts, but I didn’t get that chance. Oh well.


71 posted on 03/07/2011 10:36:41 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Well said.

The dominoes are lined up. If any one of them falls many more will fall quickly.

No one person or organization wants to be the first domino. That includes SCOTUS.

Like Watergate, the dominoes need a nudge that usually comes from the press/media. That said, remember that Gibbs directly told the pool to NOT report everything.

Orwellian....


72 posted on 03/07/2011 11:08:42 AM PST by bluecat6 ("They question our heritage but not the accuracy of our story.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

That’s a good analogy about the dominoes. Pretty much all Obama has now in the MSM and hardcore leftists (including unionists). He can hobble along for a while, but the writing is on the wall. Not to be crass, but he who laughs last laughs best. It’s impossible to laugh at the crippling damage Obama is doing right now. It will, however, be immanently possible to laugh at all those who have propped Obama up and/or refused to do their jobs. When Obama goes down, he’ll take a lot of sorry fans and enablers with him.


73 posted on 03/07/2011 11:37:15 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman; Kenny Bunk

#15 - nice take, Battman


74 posted on 03/07/2011 7:57:09 PM PST by bitt ( ..Congress - either investigate Obama ...or yourselves, for complicity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson