I wasn't the one 'inferring' anything - you were. That was the entire point of my initial reply to you.
I neither implied nor inferred. I stated a fact. A fact that you did not contest, and which I infer you agreed with. Then you went on to infer from the lack of amplification on my part, that I was implying that people should run and hide, vice voice their concerns.
To the latter I stated that you were incorrect in your inference, but you decided that my inability to make it clear enough for you to understand was in itself a conscious effort on my part to call for mass surrender.
As you have based your posts on inference, and have insisted that my clarification for you was insincere, there is appears to be that you will accept at face value.
Good day.