Thoughts, comments and/or postings of memories from the Chicago trial or riots.
1 posted on
02/18/2011 8:05:42 PM PST by
Tainan
To: Tainan
No memories. But, I will bump it.
To: Tainan
So whats the hold-up on this legal action? Have you had a look at who controls the federal government lately?
3 posted on
02/18/2011 8:10:45 PM PST by
Islander7
(There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
To: Tainan
US Code, Title 18, Part 1, Section 102
§ 2101. Riots
(a) Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent
(2) to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or
(3) to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or
(4) to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot;
and who either during the course of any such travel or use or thereafter performs or attempts to perform any other overt act for any purpose specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph
Shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Source
4 posted on
02/18/2011 8:19:49 PM PST by
mnehring
To: Tainan
Before my time, but a most excellent idea. Kudos
5 posted on
02/18/2011 8:20:36 PM PST by
TwoSwords
(The Lord is a man of war, Exodus 15:3)
To: Tainan
The state controlled academia and media (SCAM) are hoping for some kind of demonstrator-initiated confrontation with the police so they can scream about another "police riot."
That is what Chicago came to be described. A "police riot." Never mind what the Marxist-Alinsky revolutionary rabble did -- by 1968 the New Left owned the media. After Nixon was elected that year the media became part of the New Left, helped take over the Democratic Party to become the Rat Party, and they are all now arguably the Establishment.
As I recall the commercially published report about the riots (Walker Report?) had a photo on the cover of South African police attacking blacks -- none of the photos of the event supported the tenor of the biased, vicious report attacking the police. As I recall.
6 posted on
02/18/2011 8:46:48 PM PST by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: Tainan
the charges which were brought, and made to stickOnly after the Dem administration was replaced by a Republican one:
According to Wikipedia: "However, President Lyndon Johnson's Attorney General, Ramsey Clark, discouraged an indictment, believing that the violence during the convention was primarily caused by actions of the Chicago police. The grand jury returned indictments only after President Richard Nixon took office and John Mitchell assumed the office of Attorney General."
BTW, Obama's pal, Bill Ayers, was a leader in the "Days of Rage" riots.
7 posted on
02/18/2011 8:55:03 PM PST by
LibFreeOrDie
(Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
To: Tainan
That group was known as "The Chicago Seven", represented by ACLU Lawyer William Kunzler, I think. It included Abbie Hoffman, and Tom Hayden (who married Jane Fonda, aka, "Hanoi Jane"). Hayden went on to become elected to Congress, from (where else), Kalifornia.
A bunch of Hippie pukes who were the darlings of Ayers and the Weathermen crowds......
8 posted on
02/18/2011 9:19:44 PM PST by
traditional1
("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson