Posted on 02/18/2011 8:05:40 PM PST by Tainan
In the U.S.A back in the late '60s, there was a riotous situation called, appropriately enough, "The Chicago Riots."
These were also billed, on hand-outs, flyers, etc. "The Days of Rage"...general hippy leftist rioting over the VN War and all the things that made the '60s the '60s.
The follow-up to this was a long drawn out trial for "The Chicago 7." I think there were 8 but one was removed from the group for a separate trial.
My point is, the charges which were brought, and made to stick, was for 'Conspiracy to Cross a state line with the intent to cause riot and violate laws.' Or something to that effect. This was done because the perps were found to be engaged in a conspiracy to organize illegal activities and cross state lines to carry out these actions.
O.K., given this legal precedent, why can't charges such as this be used today for actions such as being engaged in in Wisconsin.
We have outside (the state) provocateurs organizing these breeches of the peace, busing in people from out-of-state to engage in these activities and numerous documented arrests for violation of state and local laws.
So whats the hold-up on this legal action?
No memories. But, I will bump it.
Have you had a look at who controls the federal government lately?
Before my time, but a most excellent idea. Kudos
That is what Chicago came to be described. A "police riot." Never mind what the Marxist-Alinsky revolutionary rabble did -- by 1968 the New Left owned the media. After Nixon was elected that year the media became part of the New Left, helped take over the Democratic Party to become the Rat Party, and they are all now arguably the Establishment.
As I recall the commercially published report about the riots (Walker Report?) had a photo on the cover of South African police attacking blacks -- none of the photos of the event supported the tenor of the biased, vicious report attacking the police. As I recall.
Only after the Dem administration was replaced by a Republican one:
According to Wikipedia: "However, President Lyndon Johnson's Attorney General, Ramsey Clark, discouraged an indictment, believing that the violence during the convention was primarily caused by actions of the Chicago police. The grand jury returned indictments only after President Richard Nixon took office and John Mitchell assumed the office of Attorney General."
BTW, Obama's pal, Bill Ayers, was a leader in the "Days of Rage" riots.
A bunch of Hippie pukes who were the darlings of Ayers and the Weathermen crowds......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.