Posted on 02/18/2011 3:58:03 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
Glenn Beck was just now, talking about George Soros, and the "no borders" leftist globalist agenda.
Something Beck called "Open Society".
While Beck was describing this agenda by Soros and the left, I was trying to think of a difference between how George Soros thinks about globalism, and how George Bush thinks about globalism.
Right? Now, donning protective garb:
But ... who was it, who referred to patriotic Americans who wanted our borders to actually be borders:
"Vigilantes"?
Sure Bush isn't Soros. The RINO establishment, isn't the Soros left.
But if the RINO establishment is pretty much against American sovereignty, against American borders, against American jobs.................
How much difference really, is there? And if there's really not much difference between the two?
How exactly are voters, supposed to choose between them?
AMERICA FIRST.
Yep - the difference is the techniques and path to their ultimate goal. Also, Leftist globalists and globalists on the right have a bit different picture of the end result. Both are just as dangerous.
Yep - the difference is the techniques and path to their ultimate goal. Also, Leftist globalists and globalists on the right have a bit different picture of the end result. Both are just as dangerous.
But they are for sale.
They are not even in the same universe. It’s like trying to compare “Nazis” and the monarchs in the 1200s. Apples and oranges.
Only in theory. They both end up the same place.
It is an important difference that often people don't look at when they just see the word Global and judge it all the same. Globalism is philosophical one-world of whom believe we should give up our sovereignty to a global authority. Globalization is an economic term that simply acknowledges the reality of international trade due to improved transportation and communication and working within that. The latter doesn't require any giving up of sovereignty while the former is based upon it.
Now, among the right and the left, the two different ideas often merge but they aren't the same. Too often, however, those of the latter are judged by the beliefs of the former.
Global socialism is still socialism no matter who pushes it.
The only difference I see is that the DemonRats are open about their intentions and the RINO’s lie about it.
Yep, think about it, the Border has not even come close to being secured, we enter into agreements that are harmful to national interests via relenquishing Sovereignty to foreign bodies such as GATT and other quasi “courts”.
And that has come from both Dhimmis and R’s whilst in the Presidency, this is Official Policy not the agenda of merely one President or group of Senators.
The really funny thing is, Fleece Trade advocates truly do believe they can have “just” the Trade and not the other things that come along with it, such as Global Warming Treaties that any fool can see are massively destructive to the US.
Ever ask oneself “why” such insane deals persist in between Administrations? Clinton dearly wanted the Kyoto Accords to be ratified, 20 yrs later and here are “Agreements on Global Climate Change” being floated.
The UN Millenium Goals are still alive and well BTW.
Well, the way I see it, the establishment is the establishment. For political expediency, they have to disagree on some issues in public, so that there can be a mock rivalry between the two sides. However, in private, most career politicos surely realize that they have more common interests with the politicos on the other side of the aisle than they do with their own constituents. So, it’s only natural that they pursue some common goals that benefit their own interests. By not opposing each other on these issues, they also avert controversy and keep those pet issues out of the public discourse for the most part.
The same thing happens in most faux democracies, like Venezuela or Iran, but then it’s usually pretty transparent. I think American politicians are a little more restrained by our Constitution, so they have had to become more sophisticated at keeping up the masquerade.
Ever see 48 hrs.? It is the good cop bad cop routine. But neither is your friend. Witness the middle east in the midst of the formation of the Arab Zone of the NWO. Zone 7 I believe. What will they call the currency after the Arab Union becomes reality? Aro?
Good post.
Thanks.
Correct. There are no Globalist on the "right". G. H. W. Bush is not a Conservative and he is not on the "right".
Both sides advance the globalist agenda for different reasons which appeal to the worldview and special interests of their constituents, each advancing policies which would be vehemently unpalatable to their supporting masses if the other side had proposed them, sugar coated with emergency and necessity and decency, but always with the same result: the loss of freedom at home and the degredation of our Constitutional Republic.
It wasn't a liberal who first mouthed the words "New World Order" on my TV, but Ronald Reagan's former Vice President.
I think it would be safe to say that globalists are globalist first and left or right second.
See also: Leftists’ deafening silence on Obama’s wiretapping, internet-tapping, patdown-tapping, everything-tapping.
BIG GOVERNMENT SNOOPING OF EVERYTHING.
While every so-called “liberal” in these United States were literally hysterical... Flat out insane with rage.
When George Bush wanted to listen to a few international calls, from KNOWN TERRORISTS.
Go figure.
Globalist = Admitted Traitors
They advocate the end of Sovereignty of the Nation State.
Their premis is wrong. They say all culture, religion and peoples are the same. They are not.
The globalists on the right want all the money and control to go to the already rich...The rich will rule...
We peons live like the Chinese...No pensions, unemployment benefits, no social security, lowest wages possible...
The leftist globalists want everyone to be controlled by the gov’t...
The leftists are a little more pro people...
Those on the right care only about the money...
It’s a disaster for us, either way...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.