Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RightField
"y'all" is really singular ... "all y'all" is plural. Who knew?

True southerners are born knowing this. I came from California, so it took me awhile to catch on.

24 posted on 02/18/2011 1:44:22 PM PST by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: paulycy

>...”y’all” is really singular ... “all y’all” is plural. Who knew? [RightField] True southerners are born knowing this. I came from California, so it took me awhile to catch on. [paulycy]

It makes me cringe to see that. :-) I’m a Southerner born and bred, and I’ve never used ‘y’all’ to address one person in my entire life (unless others were understood to be included, for instance, other members of the family). Also I’ve talked to many thousands of my fellow Southerners and never noticed a single one use ‘y’all’ for one person. I’d be shocked and wonder what was going on if I ever did.

Of course, being only one person, I can’t have knowledge of how every Southerner in every part of the South uses the expression. The majority view, though, is that ‘y’all’ is not used for one person. Wikipedia in this instance gives an adequate account of current opinion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y%27all

[I also say ‘all y’all’, but that’s to emphasize that every person is included. Dialects without ‘y’all’ say ‘you ALL’ or ‘ALL of you’ to do that, but because we use ‘y’all’ as an ordinary plural ‘you’, we lose consciousness of the ‘all’ and need an extra ‘all’ for emphasis — ‘ALL y’all’.]


41 posted on 02/18/2011 4:33:43 PM PST by GJones2 (Y'all is plural)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson