You should have links for your Palin v Bachmann specifics. That’s a good solid list. But put that list in a txt file, and hammer that one home.
I’m enouraging you because many Palin supporters have trouble dealing with a decent challenge and you present one. They know exactly who you are, and exactly what you’re saying your doing, so the target is clear. There is one of you and many many Palin supporters. If they can’t beat you, somethings wrong. But you’re tenacious and disciplined, staying on message, so you wouldn’t be all that easy to beat here.
40 Palin supporters should beat 1 you. Unless, um, you’re right.
Now, here’s a suggestion to Palin supporters. Figure out where pissant is lying. pissant will have his list “reasons why Bachmann is better than Palin”, ready to cut and paste at a moments notice, with great links substantiating your arguments. One of the 40 Palin supporters will have a text file “lies pissant told”. Another of the 40 supporters might have another list.
Many supporters should try to learn how to respond to pissants charges? Are pissants charges true? What do they mean? Perhaps Sarah’s misspelling is a new word, with a similar, but distinctly different definition than the word Sarah was trying to spell? What are the 2 different definitions? Can we get this new word in the dictionary real quick? Could Sarah have meant the exact opposite when she she retweeted Tammy Bruces “the more someone complains about the homos the more we should look under their bed”
And then 2,3,4 Palin supporters frantically spin their way to an explanation that doesn’t completely contradict everything that they want to think Palin believes. I helped with developing the idea that what Palin was saying was 1) there are gay moles in the RNC, there to be antigay, and then outed. and 2) we need to find them at the RNC and get rid of them, because they’re only going to cause massive headaches without end. Palin read what everyone else read, but she saw, somehow, because she really is in a position to make a phone call to the RNC and get rid of staffers, Tammy Bruce saying what Palin thought Bruce said. Put simply, this theory goes, Palin misunderstood what Bruce was saying.
And every day pissant finds one of these little factoids, where Palin is attacked from the right, the Palin people counter it. The end result is that people get more skilled at all of this. I like Palin, I like Ron Paul, and I like Michelle Bachmann.
Pissant is wrong to start a little Bachmann v Palin fight though. Because Bachmann is going to be supporting Palin. She almost said as much. Keeping her seat warm. And I didn’t get the idea at CPAC that Bachmann was giving the speech of someone running for President, but thanking the volunteers for hanging the decorations for the prom. I thought it was the right kind of vibe, and I’m not criticizing her at all, but if Palin wants to wait and see, wait till late for tactical reasons, it looks like Bachmann is there breaking ground for Sarah.
I didn’t start it. Dalight, or dayglow or whatever his/her name is said a) I seldom promote Bachmann. and b) that Palin and Bachmann are near 100% agreement. I’ll give you a tidbit:
VAN SUSTEREN: Governor Palin, if you were vice president today, what would you be telling a President McCain about what to do about immigration, if anything?
PALIN: I support his position on immigration.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,590022,00.html
She (Bachmann) criticized an ill-fated White House plan to beef up border security while providing ways for some illegal immigrants to legalize their status. “It smacked of amnesty,” she said. “People in the Sixth District are not in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens.”
http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/house/12819527.html