Posted on 02/05/2011 8:13:52 PM PST by Swordmaker
I bet that's not the only thing it's used for.
The app allows viewing of scans taken by other devices by transmitting them to an iPhone or iPad, it doesn’t create them itself, BigSkyFreeper.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
It wasn’t all that long ago when docs were saying that films would never be replaced with digital images.
That must been the General Practitioners that said that....
I never said the app creates them.
But hey...I could be wrong.
"...The FDA said it, "also reviewed results from demonstration studies with qualified radiologists under different lighting conditions. All participants agreed that the device was sufficient for diagnostic image interpretation under the recommended lighting conditions."..."
That seems like a hole big enough to drive a truck through. I find it hard to imagine any responsible radiologist doing a diagnostic interpretation on a cervical spine fracture xray from viewing it on an iPhone. I suppose if you are desperate, then sure, you do what you can.
At the very least, they will love it for the consultation potential. I am sure my team will hear about this on Monday morning, first thing...:)
No. Radiologists.
I had a discussion with someone who worked at a hospital that was at the vanguard of the transition to digital imaging.
There was so much resistance, that they took a piece of film, cut out the center of the film and attached it to a monitor on a workstation, so the radiologist could reach up and grab a reassuring piece of film between their fingers while they viewed the digital images.
I think they were joking.
Maybe.
IF the image is of sufficient resolution, then I don’t see why it could not be used as such - it would just take a bit longer with zooming in and looking at each individual area closely.
Most of them would never, ever go back now. Speech recognition, however, is a completely different ball of wax...:)
We have been using it for about six or seven years, now, and there are some who bitch daily about it. They would jettison that in a heartbeat.
Agreed, but...it really does seem like a stretch, when you consider the monitor calibration hassles and record keeping that one is mandated to go through on diagnostic workstations.
It just seems...er...odd.
Orthopaedists routinely consult ER docs by remotely viewing images on laptops/pc’s. Now the technology is pocket sized.
Resolution was certainly one factor, but the bigger factor was the gray scale on CRT monitors. 8-bit grayscale (256 levels) was not sufficient.
True...but a consultation is a much different beast than a diagnostic read.
Heck, people used to put images in email and such for consultation purposes.
Even still, every tool that can give clinicians a little more flexibility is a good thing. Makes our job harder, having to support this kind of thing, but if it is for improving patient care, then...it’s all good...:)
Nah, you are a Freeper! Freepers are never wrong ..... unless I disagree with them. :-)
I still keep one film viewer in the lab, but we recently threw away the last of the ones we still had in storage at the clinic.
What kind of displays are used on current workstations? The iPhone has excellent color fidelity and gamut. Or is it an issue of screen size? Do the workstations have hoods and hardware calibration? (I don't know much about radiology, but in another life I worked in print production on CRT monitors, so I know a bit about display calibration). I find it hard to imagine any responsible radiologist doing a diagnostic interpretation on a cervical spine fracture xray from viewing it on an iPhone. I suppose if you are desperate, then sure, you do what you can. At the very least, they will love it for the consultation potential. I am sure my team will hear about this on Monday morning, first thing...:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.