To: TheBattman
Agreed, but...it really does seem like a stretch, when you consider the monitor calibration hassles and record keeping that one is mandated to go through on diagnostic workstations.
It just seems...er...odd.
13 posted on
02/05/2011 8:50:33 PM PST by
rlmorel
("If this doesn't light your fire, Men, the pilot light's out!"...Coach Ed Bolin)
To: rlmorel
A lot of the calibration requirements are legacy from back before monitors were as reliable as they are today. Ten years ago, monitor calibration was a beyotch for my photography. Matching the monitor to the printer was a nightmare. Today, I take it for granted that the print will match the screen image.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson