They grow a lot of roses there that get distributed I believe...might even have one from there...
Posted on 02/04/2011 12:39:31 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
**********************
That would be interesting ...got some links...?
They grow a lot of roses there that get distributed I believe...might even have one from there...
No, it’s been so many years I don’t remember links, and my copies were on 3.5s which are scattered everywhere, but I posted most of them right here on FR during the fight to impliment sustainable forestry management out West, during the run up to impliment HFI. I’m pretty sure I remember you on those threads. Remember the billboard, “Thank you EnvironMENTALISTS for the 2002 Wildfire Season”?
and this website:
********************************EXCERPT**********************************
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Four items appeared on WUWT recently that started me on a small project.
1) Someone insisted that climate is chaotic. I think the drivers of climate are deterministic, but their combined results may appear chaotic.
2) There have been recent mentions of the end of the Holocene from Loutre & Berger (2003) at 50,000 years to Piers Corbyn - we are back in an ice age.
3) Don Easterbrooke contributed a somewhat controversial paper that included as Fig 5 an excellent GISP2 ice core graph.
4) Someone posted this link: http://www.roperld.com/science/currentmajorinterglacial.pdf to a paper by Roper that included as fig 2.1 an intriguing comparison of the Eemian with an Antarctic ice core, but GISP2 looks like a better comparison.
These inputs made me wonder if the recent Holocene could be approximated by a few simple variables, and if it might look a bit like the end of the Eemian. I chose 3 regularities that I had identified here: http://www.agwnot.blogspot.com/ that are long enough to give very visible change, that appear with little variability for the last few thousand years, that have widely different frequencies, and that could be reasonably approximated with sine curves; the 60, 179 (Jose) and 1050 year cycles......
************************************
Graphs at the website....
Yes I remember that...I think the waspman was more involved than I...
Yeah, and DFU and Jeff...there were lots of others, I don’t remember their names. You’ve been here as long as me who is that that studies soil erosion on the West coast? It’s embarrassing I can’t remember his name.
I enjoyed it a lot, and I wish that getting into space was as easy as the book portrayed.
Got to run...back later.
Yes it would. I find the politics the most interesting thing. A lot of it are the same regs they’re trying to impose on us today (I wish geophysycs were that simple too, but presumably the authors are fighting fire with fire there)
Or, perhaps they are slowly taking out their bogus "corrections" to the data (which cause the daata to show global warming) because they know they are going to get exposed.
Have a good evening.
How dare you bring in the special knowledge of the history of climate cycles, as well as the analysis that current climate readings do NOT appear out of range of those long range cycles. Only reports of politically-correct “models” are supposed to appear here!!! /sarc
The global warming here hit 21 below zero a couple of days ago.
I think Alamosa is the cold spot in Colorado,...you near there.?
Near Golden, CO. I think Fraser or Gunnison usually get the temp prize. They were colder.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
