Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/01/2011 10:10:33 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Video at WUWT...and here is link to Youtube version: :

Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Interglacial Warmth

WUWT has larger screen version.

2 posted on 02/01/2011 10:14:17 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; tubebender; Carry_Okie; Brad's Gramma; ...

Very good stuff.


3 posted on 02/01/2011 10:15:51 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
THE ACQUITTAL OF CARBON DIOXIDE
by Jeffrey A. Glassman, PhD

ABSTRACT:

"Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere [historically] is the product of oceanic respiration due to the well-known but under-appreciated solubility pump. Carbon dioxide rises out of warm ocean waters where it is added to the atmosphere. There it is mixed with residual and accidental CO2, and circulated, to be absorbed into the sink of the cold ocean waters. Next the thermohaline circulation carries the CO2-rich sea water deep into the ocean. A millennium later it appears at the surface in warm waters, saturated by lower pressure and higher temperature, to be exhausted back into the atmosphere. Throughout the past 420 millennia, comprising four interglacial periods, the Vostok record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is imprinted with, and fully characterized by, the physics of the solubility of CO2 in water, along with the lag in the deep ocean circulation.

Notwithstanding that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, atmospheric carbon dioxide has neither caused nor amplified global temperature increases. Increased carbon dioxide has been an effect of global warming, not a cause [historically -etl]. Technically, carbon dioxide is a lagging proxy for ocean temperatures. When global temperature, and along with it, ocean temperature rises, the physics of solubility causes atmospheric CO2 to increase.

If increases in carbon dioxide, or any other greenhouse gas, could have in turn raised global temperatures, the positive feedback would have been catastrophic. While the conditions for such a catastrophe were present in the Vostok record from natural causes, the runaway event did not occur. Carbon dioxide does not accumulate in the atmosphere."

http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2006/10/co2_acquittal.html
_______________________________________________________________


6 posted on 02/01/2011 10:22:25 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Whenever a Climate Alarmist spews out some “data” the article should be required to show a picture of the scammer in a clown outfit.
7 posted on 02/01/2011 10:37:30 AM PST by PATRIOT1876 (The only crimes that are 100% preventable are crimes committed by illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
And a Youtube interview with a Russian Scientist:

'Global Warming bogus, Ice Age approaching'

8 posted on 02/01/2011 10:39:09 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Lou Dobbs on this one...seems to be rather recent.....10 minutes approx.:

Scientists now see a new Ice age

9 posted on 02/01/2011 10:47:48 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
As presently constituted, earth’s atmosphere contains just slightly less than 400 ppm of the colorless and odorless gas we call carbon dioxide or CO2. That’s only four-hundredths of one percent. Consequently, even if the air’s CO2 concentration was tripled, carbon dioxide would still comprise only a little over one tenth of one percent of the air we breathe,

This should be sufficient for most "thinking" people to come to the conclusion changes in CO2 concentrations will do nothing to the climate.

15 posted on 02/01/2011 11:43:27 AM PST by SouthTexas (Is it time for tea yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is a serious response to a silly premise.
Computer models are a fiction, and a fraudulent one at that, based on fraudulent manipulated data. Why bother? It just lends credence to the manipulators.

No actual weather data prior to 1965 or so (and fed to the computers) is worth a bucketful of spit.

Historic climate facts can be claimed only if data is real and continuous over the entire earth over periods of hundreds of years. No such record exists nor can ever be "fudged" into reality.

Weather is an entirely different animal, and no amount of handwringing can transform actually measured weather data into a climate record. Of course, criminal manipulation can claim anything. The minimally science savvy don't ever have to buy it, however.

The current attitude towards CO2 is a bigger and more costly fraud than the East Anglia and supporters debacle. So let's start with that. Repeal all laws and regulations based on fraudulently considering CO2 as a major, or even significant, factor in weather change.

17 posted on 02/01/2011 12:01:32 PM PST by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Can someone point out the CO2 in the image below that is responsible for our present situation in the US. Image is updated in real time.


19 posted on 02/01/2011 6:35:10 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson