To: VeniVidiVici
Very, very few King movies are actually worth anything. I cant possibly see the Dark Tower being done in a way thats understandable without taking psychotropic drugs before watching it.
Misery was good. Stand by Me was okay. The Running Man was fun. So was Shawshank Redemption.
The Dark Tower series would lend itself well to film, especially the second book, The Drawing of the Three. But it would be ridiculous to try to compress everything into just a few hours. The reason some of King's earlier stuff was so good in print but not in film is because a lot of the story takes place in the character's mind and the humor didn't come across (Needful Things was REALLY funny in print). It's hard to show that on the screen. The Dark Tower series is a lot less like that than earlier works.
8 posted on
01/28/2011 8:12:19 AM PST by
aruanan
To: aruanan
It's funny, I've heard people say good things about Needful Things.
I've never actually seen the film, but I tend to agree with your analysis of it, based upon the novel.
There's a rich vein of dark humor in his novels.
I haven't finished any since the final, eponymous volume of The Dark Tower though.
I think that was the zenith of his career as a horror novelist.
12 posted on
01/28/2011 1:42:20 PM PST by
OddLane
To: aruanan
‘Christine’ was well done, and so were ‘It’, ‘Sometimes They Come Back’, ‘Carrie’, and ‘The Langoliers’.
Of course, ‘The Shawshank Redemption’ was a masterpiece, and ‘The Green Mile’ was excellent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson