Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'm tired of hearing some people, even from FR say that we need to "rise above the fray"!
Saturday January 22, 2011

Posted on 01/22/2011 10:24:53 AM PST by Bigtigermike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-300 next last
To: NoGrayZone
The only thing I wanted is an apology to ClearCase.

Post #7:

Christians need to be out there overturning tables and shouting at people that they're "doing it wrong".

Jesus did the same without crude and abusive language. As a Christian, I'd suggest you try that model.

Post #10 (By ClearCase_guy)

Are you accusing me of using crude and abusive language? How so?

Post #18 (My response to ClearCase_guy)

Are you accusing me of using crude and abusive language?

No, I'm not doing any such thing. It is clear, however, that many who post on FR or engage in political conversations resort very quickly to vulgar and abusive language. I just want to remind people that little exchange of ideas occur that way, and nobody yields in an argument to verbal duress. Fostering hard feelings will not solve the woes faced by our Nation. So, I agree with the original poster just as long as he intends to "push back" with skillful use of language.

-----------------------------------------------------

It seems to me that ClearCase_guy took no more offense from that point on, so my explanation very early in the thread seemed to satisfy him. I spent the rest of the time dealing with his self-appointed defenders, none of whom seemed to notice that I had rendered an explanation that I was not scolding, accusing, or otherwise casting disparity upon ClearCase_guy.

I don't see how an apology is in order since the matter was cleared between the two of us long ago.

181 posted on 01/22/2011 1:47:42 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
How can we work against our opponents if we spend so much of our combative efforts within our own ranks?

If you don't like such behavior, you must first quit practicing it. Is that so difficult to grasp?

Otherwise you come across as a hypocrite and no one will take you seriously.

182 posted on 01/22/2011 1:48:48 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear

I thought we we talking about the interworkings of places like Congress and our everyday conversations.


183 posted on 01/22/2011 1:50:48 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
you must first quit practicing it. Is that so difficult to grasp?

I don't recall using harsh language. Can you cite an instance. I'm not talking about avoiding conflict or being overly worried about strong and direct manners of speaking. I am talking about verbal abuse, profanity, vulgarity, personnal insult under the guise of political discourse.

What are you talking about?

184 posted on 01/22/2011 1:53:30 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
Otherwise you come across as a hypocrite and no one will take you seriously.

That set in pretty early, didn't it? ;-D

Don't shoot the messenger. My message is still good. We won't settle the problems facing our Nation peacefully if we don't work peacefully to do so. When it is clearly to late to work within the system, I'll be right there with you.

185 posted on 01/22/2011 1:56:46 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Is it like “speaking truth to power”?


186 posted on 01/22/2011 1:58:37 PM PST by JerseyDvl (Sometimes the road less traveled.... is less traveled for a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK; Bigtigermike
The original point, was not about harsh language, it was about civil discourse. Did you not attack Bigtigermike with your first post?

"You are just plain wrong on many levels."

Try treating other posters as you want them to behave.

187 posted on 01/22/2011 2:03:10 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
We are playing right into the hands of the MSM and liberals when we act civil and honorable "according to their rules of acting civil and honorable" which is to shut up and sit down about conservatism and not fight back

The goal of libtards is to avoid discussion of the issues because they know that they will lose. So they use two techniques to attack conservatives: ad hominem attacks and the fallacy of the argument from intimidation.

Their ad hominem attacks take the form of "conservatives are racist or bigots so their arguments are wrong".

The argument from intimidation is in the form of "only racists or bigots would believe anything that a conservative says".

188 posted on 01/22/2011 2:03:49 PM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
Don't shoot the messenger. My message is still good. We won't settle the problems facing our Nation peacefully if we don't work peacefully to do so.

There's a time for decorum. There's also a time to shout "You Lie" during the President's address.

;-)

In the interim, it's best to pray for wisdom and guidance so one acts appropriately to the situation.

189 posted on 01/22/2011 2:06:35 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: GingisK; MestaMachine
It is clear, however, that many who post on FR or engage in political conversations resort very quickly to vulgar and abusive language.

I am guilty of this, and sometimes deliberately so. It is not because I lack the capacity for civil discourse; it is because the time and framework for academic debate and civil discourse have long since passed. The difference is between the language of political debate and the necessarily dehumanizing language of the battlefield. Our opponents are using the latter (and have been for decades); and we are admonished to remain civil.

What would have been the appropriate time for the Jews to resist the NAZIs? When they were lined up at the ovens? When they were shuffling obediently to enter the boxcars? When they were being rousted out of their homes and assembled in the square? When they were forced to wear the Star of David? Kristallnacht?

Or would it, should it, have been several years before all of this, when the "civil discourse" of the day clearly demonstrated that the political dialogue would lead to horrors beyond the human ability to comprehend?

A kinder, gentler genocide is what our opponents propose.

As much as I dislike the use of scripture in political discussions, this bit from Solomon is appropriate. He was considered a pretty smart fellow back in his day.

It is our unpleasant task to foresee what is coming, before hindsight becomes 20/20, and to determine how to honestly and effectively deal with it.


Ecclesiastes 3
1 To everything there is a season,
A time for every purpose under heaven:
2 A time to be born, And a time to die;
A time to plant, And a time to pluck what is planted;
3 A time to kill, And a time to heal;
A time to break down, And a time to build up;
4 A time to weep, And a time to laugh;
A time to mourn, And a time to dance;
5 A time to cast away stones, And a time to gather stones;
A time to embrace, And a time to refrain from embracing;
6 A time to gain, And a time to lose;
A time to keep, And a time to throw away;
7 A time to tear, And a time to sew;
A time to keep silence, And a time to speak;
8 A time to love, And a time to hate;
A time of war, And a time of peace.

190 posted on 01/22/2011 2:11:23 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

“That implication seem clear to me.”

Funny isn’t it that you seem to be the only one who saw it that way?

JC


191 posted on 01/22/2011 2:16:52 PM PST by cracker45 (I don't believe in coincidences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

“Now go read all of my posts again. I did not accuse him of any such thing.”

You did not DIRECTLY accuse him of such, but you strongly implied it! Just as the left did not say Palin pulled the trigger 31 times, they DID say she was responsible and had blood on her hands because of her “inciteful language”. Are you a troll here?

JC


192 posted on 01/22/2011 2:26:49 PM PST by cracker45 (I don't believe in coincidences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack

“McCain was trying to ACT civilized in the last election, emphasis on ‘act’.”

You are absolutely correct! “McNasty” had a horrendously vindictive temper and tried to hide it on the campaign trail after getting critism for it. I have never trusted him ever since he showed his true colors in the Lincoln Savings scandal!

JC


193 posted on 01/22/2011 2:34:56 PM PST by cracker45 (I don't believe in coincidences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

No im talking about playing by their rules of civil discourse which is to say don’t accuse Obama of hurting this country by his actions, it’s silly to try to repeal ObamaCare etc......


194 posted on 01/22/2011 2:35:38 PM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Thank you PJT!

GingisK wants to stop the march until all us common rabble learn how to march in step to his drummer!

JC


195 posted on 01/22/2011 2:51:11 PM PST by cracker45 (I don't believe in coincidences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: All
I for one will not go to the stone altar of the left to have my heart cut out quietly. As I posted up thread I am done talking politely to those who want to destroy me, my family and my country. They will pay the price and “civil discourse” has not gotten it so far, I am ready to resort to other means.
196 posted on 01/22/2011 2:58:47 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (V for Vendetta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

“I hear extreme vulgarity at work, and I see it posted on Facebook pages. This is precisely why I posted my admonition...”

Seems to me you saw some crap outside of this site, and started accusing posters here of the same thing without any justification. That is just flat wrong, and you should be ashamed of yourself. Someone said it correctly earlier, that YOU are the reason this thread has turned acrimonious!

JC


197 posted on 01/22/2011 3:06:16 PM PST by cracker45 (I don't believe in coincidences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear; Bigtigermike
"You are just plain wrong on many levels."

Did you not attack Bigtigermike with your first post?

Uh, no. I spoke against his ideas, not him personnally. Are we supposed to just agree with each other on this forum, or can we take issue?

One of the biggest problems with people these days is that they consider most anything a personnal attack, including taking issue with waht they say. By the way, I didn't see Bigtigermike enter into discussion with me.

198 posted on 01/22/2011 3:08:38 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: cracker45
Funny isn’t it that you seem to be the only one who saw it that way?

So, if I don't see something like everyone sees it, I'm a bad guy? I don't have good herding instincts, and that is a fact.

199 posted on 01/22/2011 3:10:39 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Mike, I couldn’t agree more!

Either we fight or we take it in the shorts, I’m in no mood for another BOHICA election!


200 posted on 01/22/2011 3:12:40 PM PST by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-300 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson