Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama in SOTU - Means Test SS? (means testing Soc Security)
Zero Hedge ^ | 1-19-2011 | Bruce Krasting

Posted on 01/19/2011 2:47:00 PM PST by Frantzie

Next week we get the State of the Union address. The question, “Is there anything that might come from the speech that will impact the markets? The economy? Maybe. One area that I think we may get a recommendation from the President is a means tax on Social Security benefits.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: meanstesting; obama; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
My guess is O think old white folks are too rich.

50% of baby boomers (45 to 59) voted for this. 43% of people over 60 voted for it. Hope & Change.

1 posted on 01/19/2011 2:47:02 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Just another variant of soaking the “rich”. (”rich” in this case meaning “anyone who saved, worked hard, and planned wisely for their future”)

I know this is coming sooner or later; that’s why I’m shifting all the revenue I possibly can into non-compensation categories.


2 posted on 01/19/2011 2:52:15 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Can somebody translate “means testing” for me? Is it just another way of saying redistribution of wealth?


3 posted on 01/19/2011 2:52:23 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

What sucks about this is that many now ‘rich’ probably started out working dirt stinkin’ poor while putting into SS and gradually rose in income due to hard work, but get shafted because of how much wealth they have today.


4 posted on 01/19/2011 2:52:36 PM PST by Free Vulcan (The cult of Islam must be eradicated by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I wonder how many times Obummer will reference the Tuscon killings. And being there when Gabbie Gifford opened her eyes. {sniff}

He’ll probably have the parents of the cute little girl sitting next to his wife...as he declares the need for greater gun control laws.


5 posted on 01/19/2011 2:52:44 PM PST by proudpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I’m not going to critique anything our Dear Leader might suggest, not in advance at least. Let’s wait and see what the socialist has in mind.


6 posted on 01/19/2011 2:52:51 PM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

SS is going bankrupt if not already there.

www.usdebtclock.org


7 posted on 01/19/2011 2:53:34 PM PST by GlockThe Vote (Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

At the risk of offending the spirit of Claude “I will not vote for a decrease in benefits” Pepper, I am perfectly content to rename Social Security “Old Age Welfare” and means testing applicants.


8 posted on 01/19/2011 2:53:42 PM PST by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

The taxation of SS retirement benefits is a form of “means testing” that is already in place.


9 posted on 01/19/2011 2:55:43 PM PST by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Obama came in under Hope and Change.
America has liitle hope under Obama but we have gotten change
The State of the Union Address - Obama Administration 2 years later
Unemployment - Jan 2009 was 7.6 % / Jan 2011 is 9.4 %
Average price for gallon of gas - Jan 12 2009 was $1.78 / Jan 17 2011 was $3.10
National Debt - Jan 14, 2009 was 10.6 Trillion Dollars / Jan 14, 2011 was 14.0 Trillion dollars


10 posted on 01/19/2011 2:55:58 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Glenn Beck, O’Reilly and Peggy Noonan loved Obama’s funeral rally beer hall speech whilst standing on coffins.


11 posted on 01/19/2011 2:56:35 PM PST by Frantzie (Slaves do not have freedom only the illusion of freedom & their cable TV to drool at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

SS is already means tested in the sense that if you are in a higher tax bracket, you pay a greater amount of taxes on SS.

These people are talking about caps on SS or even an inverse structure where they base what you get in SS based on other income. So, if you saved appropriately, you get no SS. If you squandered everything, you will get the most SS allowed.


12 posted on 01/19/2011 2:56:35 PM PST by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction
"Can somebody translate “means testing” for me? Is it just another way of saying redistribution of wealth?"

Yes, it's another way of saying: "Stupid American public. We're stealing your money in front of your eyes and there's nothing you can do about it. So hurry up and grow old and die."

13 posted on 01/19/2011 2:56:40 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
There is already a considerable amount of means testing in the SS system. If you make twice as much as someone else throughout your life and therefore pay twice as much in SS taxes you will not get anywhere close to twice the SS payments in retirement.

It might just be time to throw aside the retirement and insurance camouflage and just state outright that Social Security is a welfare program for the old.

14 posted on 01/19/2011 2:57:56 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

“Means test” is this: If you are a person of “means” then you would not qualify for the full benefit. In other words, they see how much money you have, and if it’s too much in their view, you get less of the benefits from the government-run pension system.


15 posted on 01/19/2011 2:59:21 PM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

non-compensation categories.

what is this and where is it


16 posted on 01/19/2011 3:02:39 PM PST by Taffini ( Mr. Pippen and Mr. Waffles do not approve and neither do I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

It should be one or the other. Either it’s a pension, in which case it should be actuarially sound and not invested in the debt issued by the payer, or it should be a welfare scheme, in which case it should be funded out of general government budget.


17 posted on 01/19/2011 3:04:52 PM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Taffini

>> what is this

Here is a contrived example:

Suppose you own and operate a small business organized as an S-corp. To the extent that you can afford to take less compensation income (i.e. salary) and plow that money back into the business so you increase the value of the business when you eventually sell it, you have converted social-security-taxed compensation income to a capital gain taxed at a lower rate (and no social security “payroll” tax, as of now anyway).

That’s one way, and there are others.


18 posted on 01/19/2011 3:13:01 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

What a Gyp.


19 posted on 01/19/2011 3:19:51 PM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need....


20 posted on 01/19/2011 3:33:20 PM PST by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson