[ml/nj]

I think Kelo was decidedly wrong, but it has nothing to do with Fourth Amendment rights.

ML/NJ

[OneWingedShark]

Sure it does; if you have no right to your house then the government can arbitrarily say that it’s not your house and then claim that the 4th doesn’t protect you because you were not in your own home.... granted to do this they would need to ‘retrospectively’ lay claim to your house, but I do not think that that would hinder them much.

{My cynical opinion.}