[wendy1946]

An intelligent layman of course should have no difficulty noticing that the evolutionites who claim we have evolved from an "ape-like ancestor(TM)" over the last 10M years are now admitting that they may as well be asking evolution to produce humans from chickens in that same 10M years.

[wendy1946]

For the benefit of anybody who might have missed it, the Basic Non Evolution of Modern Man.

[misterrob]

explain michelle for us then.....

[metmom]

Ping

[smokingfrog]

[TexasPatriot1]

While we are talking evolution:

[Soothesayer]

The existence of leftists is definitive proof for evolution. However, one could argue that the superior intelligence of chimps is evidence that they are descended from leftists and not the other way around.

There is absolutely no way that any kind of God, even one less than holy, would waste his time creating these vapid parasitical leftist vermin.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Since DNA consists of a sequence of guanine, adenine, thymine and cytosine, we share 100% of the DNA of chimpanzees!

Evolution proven!

[dainbramaged]

Chimps are pretty smart for sure, but if they open a machine shop give me a call.

[metmom]

Ping

[UCANSEE2]

Well, I’ll be a monkey’s uncle!

[barbarianbabs]

My dog is SMARTER than any chimp. He would never throw poo at me.

[mnehring]

OK, sarcasm aside from my previous comment, this is pretty misleading in it seems to imply this vast difference when in reality, they are talking about a small fraction of a percent difference in a single chromosome- not an across the board genetic difference.

The standard human genetic make up is 23 chromosomes. The human haploid genome contains 3,000,000,000 DNA nucleotide pairs, divided among twenty two (22) pairs of autosomes and one pair of sex chromosomes (X/Y, or X/X). The Y chromosome alone has 24 million base pairs. And the study on this is just one small fraction of one section of those base pairs.

To put it in high level terms, in referencing the full difference, it is like saying we are no longer 98% alike but 97.999999999% alike.

[waynesa98]

if I remember the study correctly when I read it about 6 months ago, they were talking about the full genomic sequencing of both dna’s vs comparing some monkey genes to what was then known about human dna. Were talking here about what was thought to be “active dna” vs active and junk dna”, which has now been shown not to be junk.