Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

An excellenat essay responding to the chauvinistic claims of the Chua article.

I too, believe that many parents are too indulgent towards the whims of their children. However, my belief, that I try to instill in my own children, is that the building of strong moral character, good habits, and thinking for oneself are more important than the relentless pusuit of top grades.

1 posted on 01/12/2011 10:24:48 AM PST by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mojito
A live link to the Chua article, for those who may not have seen it:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704111504576059713528698754.html

2 posted on 01/12/2011 10:26:07 AM PST by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
However, my belief, that I try to instill in my own children, is that the building of strong moral character, good habits, and thinking for oneself are more important than the relentless pusuit of top grades.

I admire the (first generation american) chinese tendency to drive their children academically, but conversely I think they're far too likely to produce kids too insular & regimented to live up to their full potential in american society.

5 posted on 01/12/2011 10:34:24 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
Chua’s article is interesting because it is an unapologetic (in the traditional sense) view of the style of upbringing she supports.

It is refreshing to read an article by someone that does not assume that they might be wrong, but are convinced that they are right.

Someone who is equally convinced that their style is right would have a good discussion with her. That is what the “arena of ideas” is all about, and it is refreshing to see someone willing to go to intellectual battle.

I believe a lot of Western parents can learn a lot from her understanding of child rearing. And like most things in the western world, many will take the good and dispose of the rest.

That is the strength of the Aristotelian Western Culture and why it is superior to Chinese Culture.

6 posted on 01/12/2011 10:38:47 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

bflr


7 posted on 01/12/2011 10:38:55 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

It is funny. I know many Chinese American or Chinese immigrant families who force their kids to learn piano or violin because they believe it forces/exercises their kids brains, thus the kids will be smarter especially in math. Net effect is $ 15000 piano followed by $ 5000 lessons per child. By the time they graduate from college, few of their kids can even play the piano, but are great soccer and basketball players. Knew one parent who skimped and saved, gave best tutoring so their son can go to Princeton. Guess what, the child did what the Chinese call a Chinese parents’ nightmare, send child to prestiges expensive college and he decides to join the military via ROTC!!!! Bragging rights just evaporated!!!! IMHO children should be exposed to a disciplined classical education where the child is exposed to all academic endeavors so he/she is familiar with it and appreciative of its existence and explore which talent they possess and focus on the ones that are practical and to their liking.


9 posted on 01/12/2011 10:42:34 AM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

The Chua article is a caricature of “Chinese” parenting, and the responses to the article are absurd because they take Chua at face value. Chua is American, and it would help if the commentators had ever had serious engagement in China with real Chinese. Instead they simply react credulously to this affirmative action yuppie hypenated American professorette.


11 posted on 01/12/2011 10:47:46 AM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

We’ll have nun of that


12 posted on 01/12/2011 10:48:57 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012: don't retreat, just restock [chg'd to comply w/ The Civility in Discourse Act of 2011])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

Unless you are in the elite ruling class of China you have no more than $100 a month and a homne the size of one of our closets to live in.
These articles are pure BS because what ever point of views might claimed, the fact is the vast majority of the country live as slave labor.
The world in the article doesn’t even exist to begin with.


14 posted on 01/12/2011 10:53:01 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
Am I reading it right that Chua confessed, in writing, to abusing her child, and hasn't had charges filed yet?

"only by protection innocent, instead of by practice virtuous."

That's good way of putting it. I've seen that a lot with the children of Helicopter Parents.
15 posted on 01/12/2011 10:55:44 AM PST by Ellendra (Profanity is the mark of a conversational cripple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
I read the Chua article in the online edition of the WSJ as well as the accompanying comments, similar to what I do on FR. Great reading. As of today there are over 3,500 comments posted, I've never seen any other article in the WSJ come anywhere close to the number of comments this article has received.

What I found interesting is that postings by those who mentioned they had Chinese mothers similar to Chua were the most critical of her.

19 posted on 01/12/2011 11:07:55 AM PST by Fair Paul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

they are only allowed one child. Of course they are going to be better. they are a suppressed economy that is now booming and they are taking OUR PLACE.


20 posted on 01/12/2011 11:28:15 AM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

they are only allowed one child. Of course they are going to be better. they were a suppressed economy that is now booming and they are taking OUR PLACE. They are equal to the US during the 40’s into the 50’s probably stay at home moms.


21 posted on 01/12/2011 11:29:41 AM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
3400 plus comments on the WSJ web site so far on this story.
It hit a nerve!
24 posted on 01/12/2011 11:33:14 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Vote like Obama is on the ballot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

If China parent su good, why China farl into decrine for five hunred year?

Round eye peeprl from aal over worl, kick China aroun for make China a fool.

Haha, then we make Mao. Mao kill many bad China peeprl and make China grate agin.

See! China peeprl are more smart thand round eyes.

Watch out Untied Stats of America!!


31 posted on 01/12/2011 12:24:20 PM PST by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

“If China parent su good, why China farl into decrine for five hunred year?”
______________________________________________________________________________

I know answer!!! China chilrun get tire if burl$hit from clazy China mothers!


34 posted on 01/12/2011 12:43:43 PM PST by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson