Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj
The only instrument I've ever seen suffer from interference of any sort is an ADF which is really just a fancy AM radio.

I'm an instrument-rated pilot. I know what an ADF is.

Most of the ILS stuff is just above the FM band. Did you ever have any trouble with your FM radio reception in your car because a passenger decided to use his/her cell phone or listen to an mp3 player.

ILS and navigation are just above the FM band. But, aircraft communication is AM, not FM. FM is much better at rejecting interference.

Aircraft VOR receivers measure the phase shift between the lagging and leading navigation tones. ILS localizer and glideslope measure the difference in the depth of modulation between two transmitters with different modulation tones.

But, I have indeed heard interference -- from cell phones, computer devices, and even the local oscillator in a scanner. The difference is that I was listening to a VHF AM transceiver in the 144 MHz band (just above the aircraft band). You see, I also have an amateur radio license.

Aircraft navigation radio technologies are still the same as the 1960's. The radios have gotten better, but they still can't reject a signal that is radiated right on top of the carrier. We are in the process of migrating to satellite-based navigation, but that introduces a new problem because those signals are even weaker than ground-based signals, and are near frequencies used by computing devices.

I explained the reasons why the prohibitions are in effect. If you don't believe it, that's your problem... not mine. The FAA makes the rules, and the rules have been in effect for decades, with only minor modifications:

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=bd96dfddf4fbaaf320e8cae4562b47c5&rgn=div8&view=text&node=14:3.0.1.1.4.11.2.4&idno=14

Note that the regulation says: "Any other portable electronic device". It doesn't say "any other type of portable electronic device". It's an important distinction, because it means that the aircraft operator must test individual devices, rather than testing a sample of a class of devices and allowing those.

67 posted on 01/04/2011 10:51:04 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking
I'm an instrument-rated pilot.

Oooooh, an instrument rated pilot! I probably had my ticket before you were born. It's been a while since I've flown but I have to say I do not recall even hearing interference from lightning on my radios. I certainly saw my share of lightening in the air.

I see you mostly dropped your 1960s BS. I remember when Walkmen (portable cassette tape players) were how we listened to music on airplanes, I was doing a lot of flying from Newark to Orlando. This was in the early 80s. These flights lasted almost exactly as long as the opera Fidelio, which, when I selected it, would end just as we touched down. Somehow my little Walkman never disturbed anything, and nobody cared that I was listening.

ML/NJ

70 posted on 01/04/2011 11:49:16 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson