Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

You are incredibly ignorant.

It is an industrial fact, posted at the American Petroleum Institute, that over 45% of every barrel of oil is used for manufacturing materials, medical supplies, building materials, food packaging (water bottles, etc,) plastics, electrical components etc,,, The list is vast and thorough.

There again, you make brash statements without backing them with facts. Which convinces me that the rest of your B.S. is nothing more than just that. Especially your Cold Fusion theory. Which if it were so complete and superior, would be the Worlds most widely used form of Energy by now.

That is, if it were true. You make it sound so abundant and easy, even a Cave Man could do it!


14 posted on 12/31/2010 2:45:14 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP ( Give me Liberty, or give me an M-24A2!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Feel free to post data. It doesn’t show up on first pass google hits so far.

Petroleum Products Yielded from One Barrel of Crude, 2004

Product Gallons

Finished Motor Gasoline 19.65
Distillate Fuel Oil 10.03
Kero-Type Jet Fuel 4.07
Residual Fuel Oil 1.72
Still Gas 1.85
Petroleum Coke 2.18
Liquefied Refinery Gas 1.68
Asphalt and Road Oil 1.34
Naptha for Feedstocks 0.67
Other Oils for Feedstocks 0.55
Lubricants 0.46
Special Naphthas 0.13
Kerosene 0.17
Miscellaneous Products 0.17
Finished Aviation Gasoline 0.04
Waxes 0.04

http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/infosheets/crudeproduction.htm


21 posted on 12/31/2010 2:57:23 AM PST by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

You are incredibly ignorant. It is an industrial fact,
***I just posted an industrial fact which I found while searching for your industrial fact, and it shows you to be incredibly ignorant. So, knock off the personal attacks, STFU, and start addressing the issues. If the list is “vast and thorough” you should have no trouble producing it.

There again, you make brash statements without backing them with facts.
***How is that brash? I asked in the non-assuming tone, “what, 5%?”. You’re the one who is brash.

Which convinces me that the rest of your B.S. is nothing more than just that.
***You’re mighty fast to jump to conclusions, resort to immediate insults, and yet there is not much factual refutation in your post. Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

Especially your Cold Fusion theory. Which if it were so complete and superior, would be the Worlds most widely used form of Energy by now.
***Same, same, same argument, over and over again. Rehash rehash. If your argument were valid, we’d be driving hot fusion cars by now.

That is, if it were true. You make it sound so abundant and easy, even a Cave Man could do it!
***No I don’t. That’s why I argue that the cold fusion guys should get some of that research money that the hot fusion guys have been getting. But your argument is, of course, a straw argument which leads any lurker to wonder why you would need to resort to classic fallacies in addition to your quick insults, rather than address the facts on the ground.


23 posted on 12/31/2010 3:03:29 AM PST by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

You are incredibly ignorant. It is an industrial fact, posted at the American Petroleum Institute, that over 45% of every barrel of oil is used for manufacturing materials, medical supplies, building materials, food packaging (water bottles, etc,) plastics, electrical components etc,,, The list is vast and thorough.
***And you are full of bovine fecal matter. I posted upthread one breakdown of an average barrel of oil, which is unrefuted by you AND you have yet to produce your precious data from American Petroleum Institute. 45%, what a crock. Even Wikipedia shows it to be more like 15%.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_product
Which points to this link that is showing current trends at about half that...

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pnp_pct_dc_nus_pct_m.htm


41 posted on 12/31/2010 10:13:33 PM PST by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson