[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

From the comments:

***********************************************EXCERPT************************************

Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

December 28, 2010 at 5:41 am

since CO2 is a GHG it follows that increasing CO2 must increase the temperature (of something).

A more likely scenario, from Reginald Newell (MIT, NASA, IAMAP)

1 minute video

Click here

[TheBigIf]

Great article but I fear that it might start a new left-wing greenie campaign to have ‘air’ regulated as a pollutant being that it upsets there fantasy versions of science and physics.

How dare the ‘air’ hold up that feather. If we dont do something about it next whole islands and even continents or oceans may float up a tree. Somehow mankind is to blame for this!!!!

They already are there I know. Greenie = idiot

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

fyi

[TigersEye]

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

The missing hotspot (JoNova)

Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.

The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'

It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming

Those four articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

That article pretty much puts the kibosh on any serious trend of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign at all of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? Beyond the centuries long slow warming of the earth and rising of the seas of course. But that is only a few millimeters per century due to the inter-glacial period we are in.

[MontaniSemperLiberi]

Be a bit wary of Judith. She’s skeptical but not skeptical enough.

I’ll take this post as a step in the right direction but she has not left the GWT camp, AFAIK.

As an aside, IIRC, she was the one who cautioned the IPCC folks about trying to us the results from AGW models to predict specific local changes in average temperature. My guess is that this stand came from her hurricane research.

[The Comedian]

This is a bit off-topic, but expecting Americans, or most humans in general, to understand simple physics and the implications of finite but chaotic systems is like expecting a black Labrador to drive NASCAR successfully.

For starters, government schools have beaten any sense of intrinsic logic right out of the population. And society shows its teeth at any display of cohesive, productive individual intelligence.

Instead, society glorifies constrained collective actions (teams) in artificial circumstances (games) that accomplish nothing (sports). And when someone actually achieves something useful (capitalists or *real* scientists who blew the whistle on this global warming baloney), they are demonized.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[GeronL]

I have read somewhere that most of the climate is localized not global, whatever that means.

[JoeFromSidney]

physics works by isolating simple situations from reality.

The biggest mess you ever saw

Is governed by some simple law.

You can make some sense of it

If you ignore enough of it.

[editor-surveyor]

The greenhouse effect itself has been completely debunked as it would violate basic principles of thermo.

The only gas that effects anything is water vapor, and it doesn’t warm, it cools, by shading and reflecting away the sun’s energy. But it also stores heat as potential energy, which moderates temps.