For example, a great case has been made that the Sphinx in Egypt is 10,000 years old. It defies conventional modern science by using hydrology to explain the type of wear and tear that they Sphinx has.
Modern Science is perpetually in upheaval. Things are constantly being proved AND disproved. But evidence relies on science to disprove science. New methods, new algorithms, new technologies.
CAVEAT: I am very religious person. But somehow, when it comes to science, I have relied more on the “modern” science method
Well, I guess you haven't noticed that the evos are too. They =believe= so it must be true. My objections to evolution and geology are scientific, not religious. The supposed experts want to gloss over their contradictions because they don't have any better stories to tell. I am troubled by contradictions. I am not troubled by not having answers.
ML/NJ