Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BibChr
He was always John Wayne. It wasn't his fault. It's not a criticism. It's a fact. John Wayne was not an actor. He was an institution.
64 posted on 12/22/2010 6:43:27 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well, I do disagree with you. He does not get nearly enough credit for his acting. Check the three I mentioned: you can’t name an actor who’d bring those characters alive as effectively, let alone more effectively, and evocatively.


66 posted on 12/22/2010 6:59:45 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I saw those movies. They're great movies. Been remade dozens of times in various guises. But John Wayne was playing John Wayne in them.

That's what happens when your persona supersedes your art.

67 posted on 12/22/2010 8:16:37 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson