Replies

The ‘goalposts’ you just erected were passed with flying colors by the GW scientists - right up until the hundreds of emails were posted on the internet from East Anglia University. Still there are some trying/hoping to resurrect it - thank God for the internet or who knows if this would not also persist for a century or two.

See creationscience.com for someone w/ credentials. Dr Walt Brown Ph.D M.I.T, an engineer who worked exstensively as an evolutionary scientist, separates what is logical and true from what can not be proven in this online book (part 1).

You can also purchase the 8th edition for around $30. The book has plenty of quotes and references to both established science and other publications (often stuff deemed not worthy of review by the powers that be).

Of course, if you knew of the bias involved in our peer-reviewed science then you would also know the powers that be will never consider his hydroplate theory (part 2) as science. Part 3 is commonly asked questions and answers as well as a $1million challenge for a creation-evolution debate.

BTW creation evolution debates slowed down then stopped completely more than 50 years ago. Why do you think that is?

hmmm ~ my uniqueness

You do know uniqueness is both Biblically and scientifically established truth ~ right?!

Reminds me of a favorite bumper sticker:
Just remember you are unique
Just like everybody else

Also I accept truth most often where the Bible and science agree. Where they differ I accept the Bible on blind faith.

B.I.B.L.E. ~ Blessed Intervention Begetting Life Everlasting

BrandtMichaels: "The ‘goalposts’ you just erected were passed with flying colors by the GW scientists - right up until the hundreds of emails were posted on the internet from East Anglia University."

There are a huge number of recognized scientists who have never bought into the Anthropogenic (meaning man-made) Global Warming hoax -- certainly not as presented by Al Gore and other such political figures.
These scientists publish in scientific journals and appear in the popular media.
That's the reason there are plenty of quotes and data available for people who wish to make the case against AGW.

A similar core of recognized scientists does not exist to dispute the basics of evolution theory.

BrandtMichaels: "See creationscience.com for someone w/ credentials.
Dr Walt Brown Ph.D M.I.T, an engineer who worked exstensively as an evolutionary scientist, separates what is logical and true from what can not be proven in this online book (part 1)."

I understand that Brown is a "known commodity" with a long history and active career of speaking and debating in anti-evolution circles.
Over the years he's tangled with not only scientific groups, such as The National Center for Science Education, but also other Creationists, such as Answers in Genesis, Answers in Creation, and The Christian American Scientific Affiliation.

Some of these groups, and others too, have made serious efforts to analyze, criticize and even debunk Brown's ideas.
Others have offered him opportunities to debate, which Brown has turned down.

My view is that the world is chock full of crackpots who will tell you most anything (i.e., the earth is flat, moon made of green cheese) if you are willing to believe it.
So, seems to me that enough people have already taken Brown on -- in terms of both science and religion -- that I don't need to duplicate their previous efforts.