Well then there is no such thing as a uni-verse.
“uni-verse”
which means a single spoken sentence.
My question is: where exactly are these other universes supposed to be? In another dimension? Or is it like radio waves, where the waves travel simultaneously at different frequences—this way they don’t intefere with each other when they traverse the same space.
If there is an alternate conservative universe, I’d like to go there—NOW!!
It also means they know the limits of our UNIverse.
Is there an anti-verse?
One only has to look at the Democrat party to know there is an alternate Universe!
The big bang idea was never based on anything more than a misinterpretation of cosmic redshift. Halton Arp destroyed that and intelligent people are starting to reject it.
Like the theory of evolution, the big bang idea is a bunch of bullshit which is mainly being defended by academic dead wood. The idea of multiple universes is mainly motivated by a clear understanding of the laws of probability and what the odds are against evolution and evoloserism in the one universe we actually have in real life.
You are right unless we define 'universe' as everything that is. Then what we have until now thought of as the universe is just a sub-component of the actual universe and it needs a different name.
Of course the more the definition of 'universe' is stretched the less it means. If we add 'everything that was' and 'everything that will be' to 'everything that is' to the definition of 'universe' it becomes less and less quantifiable. Add 'everything that never was and never will be' (why not? isn't the universe 'everything?') and 'universe' becomes something that is impossible to ever measure, mentally picture or understand.
I simultaneously love and hate these mental conundrums. ;^)