You're the one defending the idea that a human who mistreats an animal should be put to death, not me.
That was my original question, and so far only one person has even attempted to defend that statement.
You've tried to deflect, and finally ran away when I challanged you to do defend it.
To give the death penalty to a human for mistreatment of an animal is, at best silly, at worst criminal.
“To give the death penalty to a human for mistreatment of an animal is, at best silly, at worst criminal.”
Yet you wholeheartedly support the “vigilante” killing of other human beings for “road rage”?
To: 4Runner
Very similar situation happened here in CO to one of my neighbors about 10 or 15 years ago.
I was glad to see that someone took the hot-head off the streets for good. Who knows how many lives were saved.
Don’t attack through the car window here in CO either, ‘cuz you may well turn up in the morgue, and the shooter will be hailed as a hero. As it should be.
A lot less road rage since we’ve had the option to take care of out-of-control drivers.
Just as with store thieves, home invaders, and any other of the assortment of human debris, it does my heart good to know a few of these are now 6 feet under.
You don’t want to kill them? No problem. Fortunately someone else will.
109 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:31:32 PM by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
“I was glad to see that someone took the hot-head off the streets for good. Who knows how many lives were saved.”
Indeed.
Who knows how many potential human lives could be saved by taking animal torturers “off the street for good”.
In fact, you’ve quite a liberal list of “acceptable killing offenses”.
Hypocrisy, thy name is “Balding Eagle”.
Admit it.
You just have some kind of weird “thing” for Secret Agent Man.
Wow, I am so inside your head. Inside the head of a rock.
Nope, it isn’t, and I fully understand your inability to see it because after all your posts it’s clear to everyone here you just have not thought this through from more than just one viewpoint. Not even from a private proerty angle.
You do realize the law allows (in almost all states) for a person to shoot a burglar committing felony theft. Kidnapping a pet worth thousands of dollars is felony theft. That would also apply to protecting said animals’ life if that life was being threatened. My animals are my property and they are not replaceable, and almost all people who have animals view it that way. Many people depend on their animals for a living. You destroy their animals you destroy their ability to earn a living and jeopardize their families’ futures. Why you’d think people wouldn’t defend their animals is assinine.
Have you not ever thought these things through from more than just one angle? You might want to try sometime instead of just looking at an issue from one view.
I don’t expect you to understand, I don’t think you can.