Nope, it isn’t, and I fully understand your inability to see it because after all your posts it’s clear to everyone here you just have not thought this through from more than just one viewpoint. Not even from a private proerty angle.
You do realize the law allows (in almost all states) for a person to shoot a burglar committing felony theft. Kidnapping a pet worth thousands of dollars is felony theft. That would also apply to protecting said animals’ life if that life was being threatened. My animals are my property and they are not replaceable, and almost all people who have animals view it that way. Many people depend on their animals for a living. You destroy their animals you destroy their ability to earn a living and jeopardize their families’ futures. Why you’d think people wouldn’t defend their animals is assinine.
Have you not ever thought these things through from more than just one angle? You might want to try sometime instead of just looking at an issue from one view.
I don’t expect you to understand, I don’t think you can.
You are afraid to answer my simple challanges, aren’t you?
Such easy questions I ask, answers that can be given in a simple sentece or two, yet you feel you must write paragraphs and paragraphs, carefully dancing around the most simple question.
Is it appropriate to kill the person who mistreats an animal?