Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Jeopardy' to pit humans against IBM machine
Associated Press ^ | 12-13-10 | DAVID BAUDER

Posted on 12/13/2010 9:36:29 PM PST by Justaham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 12/13/2010 9:36:30 PM PST by Justaham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Ugh, always worries me when people do this kind of thing. It gives the uninitiated the false impression that there is such a thing as “real” AI.


2 posted on 12/13/2010 9:40:35 PM PST by TheZMan (Just secede and get it over with. No love lost on either side. Cya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
while Jennings and Rutter said they would give half of their prize money away.

I believe that is called "taxes." I'll take "25%" for 1,000,000 Alex.

3 posted on 12/13/2010 9:56:05 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012: don't retreat, just reload)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Why not just have a computer do what Alex does, that would be easy. I’m sure it would do just as good a job, and not look smug while doing it.


4 posted on 12/13/2010 9:57:38 PM PST by Avery Iota Kracker (He hate me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

So what do they do with “Watson”? Hook a Cat5 into it, and have it Google every Jeopardy question? Chess is one thing—there are moves and counter-moves to study and predict. Jeopardy is just straight factoid knowledge.


5 posted on 12/13/2010 9:58:56 PM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Perhaps it’s like the computer that took voice commands from Scotty in the original Star Trek Series


6 posted on 12/13/2010 10:01:49 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
'Jeopardy' to pit humans against IBM machine

I propose an even greater challenge:


7 posted on 12/13/2010 10:02:45 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Are You Smarter Than God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

I agree. This is more of a database interface issue than anything else.


8 posted on 12/13/2010 10:03:45 PM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
In the Jeopardy format, puter will kick their ass.
9 posted on 12/13/2010 10:04:57 PM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Open the door Hal.


10 posted on 12/13/2010 10:07:06 PM PST by screaminsunshine (Americanism vs Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan; Charles Henrickson; Salamander; Markos33
"Ugh, always worries me when people do this kind of thing. It gives the uninitiated the false impression that there is such a thing as “real” AI."

The enemies of free markets, open societies, free worship, public expression of faith and ultimately free thinking itself have always had a vested interest in reducing the perception of human intelligence to synapses, relays bit and bytes.

Along with fellow travelers in the Humanist movement, atheists like B.F. Skinner have reveled in the notion that man and his society could be reduced to the soulless responses of machine like patterned behavior. The goal of demonstrations such as these is a thinly veiled attempt to push man's conception of himself into that void foreshadowed in Skinner's "Beyond Freedom And Dignity."

Sorry, but I, along with most of the Conservative FRiends I have on this site will keep both - the freedom and the dignity - along with our souls.


11 posted on 12/13/2010 10:19:10 PM PST by shibumi (Trailerpark Viking Overlord Pablo (with His Dark Yet Whimsical Band of Cut Throats))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Danger! Will Robinson!

12 posted on 12/13/2010 10:20:27 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Well, it would have to understand the subject and the question. So there’s a lot of text analysis and comprehension required (very difficult) and then it has to access it’s knowledge base for an answer, pick the correct answer, and phrase it as a question.

Not really so easy with a computer. What helps is the rigid format of Jeopardy questions.


13 posted on 12/13/2010 10:27:02 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

I guess it’s about natural language parsing. It’s one thing for a computer to solve “SELECT max(age) FROM xvii_century WHERE country IN europe etc...” and another to understand “This NFL quarterback is a great-great-great-grandson of Brigham Young” well enough to look for the answer.


14 posted on 12/13/2010 10:38:59 PM PST by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

What is...Judgment Day?

Correct!

I’ll take bad ideas in science for a Thousand, Alex.


15 posted on 12/13/2010 10:40:50 PM PST by BigCinBigD (Northern flags in South winds flutter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
This is more of a database interface issue than anything else.

I'm thinking search terms and connection speed.

16 posted on 12/13/2010 10:43:45 PM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moose Burger

Yes, that’s it: Designing a computer that can process and understand natural language http://www.research.ibm.com/deepqa/


17 posted on 12/13/2010 10:51:07 PM PST by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

I dunno, but Deep Blue sure made a fool out of Kasparov. He used to be interested in computer chess, but not after that. He should have played some old Windows 3.0 programs like GNU Chess and Winchess. Those things had amazingly stupid AIs.

Actually, the chess program included with Windows 7 is just as stupid, but the graphics are better.


18 posted on 12/13/2010 10:55:52 PM PST by Strk321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

As one of the last GIs to use Morse Code in military communication, it was of great interest to me about a month ago when some outfit held a contest between two guys communicating via Morse, and two other guys using cell phones to send text messages. The two teams were given identical messages to send back and forth.

The two guys using Morse did not use a standard telegraph key, but rather a semi-automatic mechanical speed device we called a “Bug” in the Army. The Morse Code guys got their messages sent back and forth, and then “had time for a sandwich” before the texters were finished! Hopefully the contest with “Watson” will have a similar outcome. Hoooaahh!!


19 posted on 12/13/2010 10:59:53 PM PST by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strk321

I remember that Kasparov used to play versus Fritz.


20 posted on 12/13/2010 11:00:07 PM PST by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson