Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Homer_J_Simpson

Patton’s comments on the armored division’s equipment are interesting, although I suspect even he realized that US tanks weren’t up to snuff.


11 posted on 12/13/2010 5:54:27 AM PST by Elwood P. Doud (America, you voted for a negro socialist with an Islamic name - so why act surprised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Elwood P. Doud; Homer_J_Simpson
I think that with the exception of the small cannons on them at present they are meeting his expectation of what he expects from a tank division. Realize that Patton's philosophy on tank warfare is not to use them as a frontal battering ram, but as a fast attack force that is to get into the enemy's rear areas and wreak havoc from behind. While addressing a lawyer's club meeting in Columbus, GA he made this statement: (I don't have a date on this but it would be around this time while he is stationed at Ft. Benning)

You can kill more soldiers by scaring them to death from behind with a lot of noise than you can by attacking them from the front.

12 posted on 12/15/2010 9:01:19 AM PST by CougarGA7 (It take a village to raise an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson