Skip to comments.
No evidence of time before Big Bang
Nature ^
| 12/10/10
| Edwin Cartlidge
Posted on 12/12/2010 8:51:25 AM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Young Werther
Definitely two of my favorite herbs!
To: dr_who
Tha’ be nonsense. T’was nae an *evil* dwarf. Th’ tree be th’ source of evil.
22
posted on
12/12/2010 10:13:40 AM PST
by
BenKenobi
(Obama's book of the month, Herman Melville's Killin' Whitey)
To: LibWhacker
The 'concept' of time has always fascinated me. What ever 'force' or 'being' created both us and the universe gave us atomic particles that can decay in milliseconds; our individual lives are measured in mere years; and the universe as far as we have determined at this point is roughly 14 or 15 billion years old.
How can that be? What is the purpose of creating a life form that exists mere years in a universe that will continue for perhaps billions of years or forever?
Very strange.
23
posted on
12/12/2010 10:45:43 AM PST
by
Doc Savage
(Stay Thirsty My Friend!!)
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
aaahhh... must have confused him with the guy who explained why background radiation is spread all over the universe and not localized where the big bang happened. Because everywhere was where it happened and then expanded outwar.
Something like that.
25
posted on
12/12/2010 10:49:36 AM PST
by
GeronL
(#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
26
posted on
12/12/2010 11:19:07 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: KoRn; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
27
posted on
12/12/2010 11:21:56 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: LibWhacker
Even if information survived the theoretical singularity during the big bang which is questionable. It would be so distorted by a multitude of forces we cannot even model that it’s completely useless.
28
posted on
12/12/2010 11:36:08 AM PST
by
allmost
To: Doc Savage; LibWhacker; SunkenCiv
Time is just a reference (point) in (this) physical reality. A part of the creation. After you die you exist in a “no time” environment.
What is the life expectancy of a fresh baked cookie compared to the entire prep time? That includes all the processes. From growing the grain, raising the cane, down the line to actually mixing them in a bowl and baking. See what I mean?
29
posted on
12/12/2010 12:00:34 PM PST
by
bigheadfred
(STAND IN THE CLOSET AND SCREAM WITH ME)
To: allmost
Yeah, it’d be interesting to see the math that says ripples from a previous aeon could somehow survive into this one.
To: LibWhacker
No evidence of doing time before Big Bang -
Sing Sing hadn`t been sung yet.
To: SunkenCiv; betty boop; Alamo-Girl
Fascinating . . .
time before time . . .
32
posted on
12/12/2010 12:47:03 PM PST
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Doc Savage
It´s possible that God cares for many life forms throughout the universe; particularly those that have abstracted information from their environment thus to know Him.
33
posted on
12/12/2010 1:11:01 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: GeronL
didnt a guy win a Nobel prize for that discovery they are casting doubt on?? One reason that is unlikely is that IIRC Nobels are supposed to be given for discoveries that might have some practical application.
To: Doc Savage
>>Very strange.
Even stranger when one considers that Time is a derivative function of state-change that progresses relative to E within the inertial frame(s) in which it is observed.
As E approaches infinity an eternity could pass within a single blink of an unmoved eye...
35
posted on
12/12/2010 2:20:44 PM PST
by
LomanBill
(Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
To: SunkenCiv
Thanks for the ping. This seems to have kind of a high duhh factor to me.
36
posted on
12/12/2010 2:30:17 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: LibWhacker
No evidence of Time before Big Bang No, but I think Newsweek was around.
To: Quix
I’ve got a recent magazine around here (somewhere) with an article about the search for traces of the previous universe.
38
posted on
12/12/2010 2:34:55 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: Kevmo
39
posted on
12/12/2010 2:37:36 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: MHGinTN
I haven’t gobbled any fire lately. Doesn’t settle very well in my stomach.
40
posted on
12/12/2010 3:46:01 PM PST
by
dr_who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson