Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No evidence of time before Big Bang
Nature ^ | 12/10/10 | Edwin Cartlidge

Posted on 12/12/2010 8:51:25 AM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Young Werther

Definitely two of my favorite herbs!


21 posted on 12/12/2010 10:07:32 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dr_who

Tha’ be nonsense. T’was nae an *evil* dwarf. Th’ tree be th’ source of evil.


22 posted on 12/12/2010 10:13:40 AM PST by BenKenobi (Obama's book of the month, Herman Melville's Killin' Whitey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The 'concept' of time has always fascinated me. What ever 'force' or 'being' created both us and the universe gave us atomic particles that can decay in milliseconds; our individual lives are measured in mere years; and the universe as far as we have determined at this point is roughly 14 or 15 billion years old.

How can that be? What is the purpose of creating a life form that exists mere years in a universe that will continue for perhaps billions of years or forever?

Very strange.

23 posted on 12/12/2010 10:45:43 AM PST by Doc Savage (Stay Thirsty My Friend!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

save


24 posted on 12/12/2010 10:47:12 AM PST by Texas Songwriter ( ma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

aaahhh... must have confused him with the guy who explained why background radiation is spread all over the universe and not localized where the big bang happened. Because everywhere was where it happened and then expanded outwar.

Something like that.


25 posted on 12/12/2010 10:49:36 AM PST by GeronL (#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

Thanks KoRn.
 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·

26 posted on 12/12/2010 11:19:07 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KoRn; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks KoRn!


· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·

27 posted on 12/12/2010 11:21:56 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Even if information survived the theoretical singularity during the big bang which is questionable. It would be so distorted by a multitude of forces we cannot even model that it’s completely useless.


28 posted on 12/12/2010 11:36:08 AM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage; LibWhacker; SunkenCiv

Time is just a reference (point) in (this) physical reality. A part of the creation. After you die you exist in a “no time” environment.

What is the life expectancy of a fresh baked cookie compared to the entire prep time? That includes all the processes. From growing the grain, raising the cane, down the line to actually mixing them in a bowl and baking. See what I mean?


29 posted on 12/12/2010 12:00:34 PM PST by bigheadfred (STAND IN THE CLOSET AND SCREAM WITH ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Yeah, it’d be interesting to see the math that says ripples from a previous aeon could somehow survive into this one.


30 posted on 12/12/2010 12:02:31 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
No evidence of doing time before Big Bang -

Sing Sing hadn`t been sung yet.

31 posted on 12/12/2010 12:25:25 PM PST by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; betty boop; Alamo-Girl

Fascinating . . .

time before time . . .


32 posted on 12/12/2010 12:47:03 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

It´s possible that God cares for many life forms throughout the universe; particularly those that have abstracted information from their environment thus to know Him.


33 posted on 12/12/2010 1:11:01 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
didn’t a guy win a Nobel prize for that “discovery” they are casting doubt on??

One reason that is unlikely is that IIRC Nobels are supposed to be given for discoveries that might have some practical application.

34 posted on 12/12/2010 1:24:35 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

>>Very strange.

Even stranger when one considers that Time is a derivative function of state-change that progresses relative to E within the inertial frame(s) in which it is observed.

As E approaches infinity an eternity could pass within a single blink of an unmoved eye...


35 posted on 12/12/2010 2:20:44 PM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thanks for the ping. This seems to have kind of a high duhh factor to me.


36 posted on 12/12/2010 2:30:17 PM PST by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
No evidence of Time before Big Bang

No, but I think Newsweek was around.

37 posted on 12/12/2010 2:33:03 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I’ve got a recent magazine around here (somewhere) with an article about the search for traces of the previous universe.


38 posted on 12/12/2010 2:34:55 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

My pleasure. :’)


39 posted on 12/12/2010 2:37:36 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I haven’t gobbled any fire lately. Doesn’t settle very well in my stomach.


40 posted on 12/12/2010 3:46:01 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson