Skip to comments.
Matter/Antimatter from the Vacuum
Centauri Dreams ^
| 12/10/10
| Paul Gilster
Posted on 12/10/2010 2:37:31 PM PST by LibWhacker
Matter/Antimatter from the Vacuum
by Paul Gilster on December 10, 2010
New work at the University of Michigan, now written up in Physical Review Letters, discusses the possibility of producing matter and antimatter from the vacuum. The idea is that a high-energy electron beam combined with an intense laser pulse can pull matter and antimatter components out of the vacuum, creating a cascade of additional particles and anti-particles. UM Engineering research scientist Igor Sokolov has this to say about the theoretical study:
“We can now calculate how, from a single electron, several hundred particles can be produced. We believe this happens in nature near pulsars and neutron stars…
That would make the vacuum a lively place indeed, as Sokolov acknowledges:
It is better to say, following theoretical physicist Paul Dirac, that a vacuum, or nothing, is the combination of matter and antimatterparticles and antiparticles.Their density is tremendous, but we cannot perceive any of them because their observable effects entirely cancel each other out.
Of course, to produce these hundreds of particles from a single electron, we need not only an ultra-high-intensity laser beam but a two-mile long particle accelerator. But the model is intriguing. Were deep in the realm of quantum electrodynamics (QED), which describes how electrically charged particles interact by exchanging photons. Richard Feynman called QED the jewel of physics because of its predictive capabilities. Feynmans QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (1986) is based on a lecture series designed for the general public, and without it, those of us who are mathematically challenged wouldnt have a chance with QED ideas.
Reading the Sokolov paper, I can see that its time for me to return to Feynman, or maybe this Wikipedia entry, which calls QED a perturbation theory of the electromagnetic quantum vacuum, and goes on to provide a useful backgrounder on the theorys evolution. But lets say this: Normally, matter and antimatter destroy each other when they come into contact. The UM team is interested in how this annihilation may be averted under certain conditions. Thus Sokolov colleague John Nees:
“…in a strong electromagnetic field, this annihilation, which is typically a sink mechanism, can be the source of new particles. In the course of the annihilation, gamma photons appear, which can produce additional electrons and positrons.”
One experiment in the 1990s produced effects that the Sokolov paper calls weak and barely observable, creating gamma photons and electron/positron pairs, but the new work suggests that ramping up the laser pulse intensity should produce a more definitive result. The UM teams equations model how a sufficiently strong laser could cause the creation of more particles than were initially injected into the experiment through a particle accelerator. Sokolov again:
“If an electron has a capability to become three particles within a very short time, this means it’s not an electron any longer. The theory of the electron is based on the fact that it will be an electron forever. But in our calculations, each of the charged particles becomes a combination of three particles plus some number of photons.”
The HERCULES laser at the University of Michigan is one way to test this work in a small-scale laboratory setting, but a similar laser would have to be built at a particle accelerator like the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory at Stanford to work out all its implications, and because no such construction is planned, it may be some time before we can take these ideas forward. The team speculates that their theory may have applications for inertial confinement fusion — I bring this up particularly because of the interest of the Project Icarus team in ICF — but its a case of intriguing theory awaiting the experimental infrastructure to test it adequately.
The paper is Sokolov et al., “Pair Creation in QED-Strong Pulsed Laser Fields Interacting with Electron Beams,” Physical Review Letters Vol. 105, 195005 (2010) Abstract/Preprint. The paper is so dense in mathematics that I want to be sure to give you this news release as well.
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: antimatter; catastrophism; matter; michigan; stringtheory; vacuum; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: LibWhacker
The universe - a show about nothing (cue Seinfeld).
21
posted on
12/10/2010 3:18:50 PM PST
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: allmost
Yup, that’s the problem. All previous attempts to harvest, or describe a way to harvest, the so-called zero point energy are viewed as pseudoscience because they just don’t work. Not even close. Hoping this one is a little different.
To: LibWhacker; whatisthetruth; fabian; tedw
There is a physics talk radio show....www.gravitydrivenuniverse.org Its on saturday and sunday evenings....very interesting. You can listen to an archived show....bring this up and the 3 host will discuss it with you...
The host wrote a book, Finding God in Physics.
23
posted on
12/10/2010 3:22:38 PM PST
by
abigail2
To: dhs12345
If you observe it to detect a particle, a particle it will be. If you seek to observe a wave, a wave it will be. Your choice.
And forget the planetary orbiting pictures from high school physics books, it just isn’t quite that way per Heisenberg.
24
posted on
12/10/2010 3:23:04 PM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: LibWhacker
Are we going to see that guy Dyson on television commercials plugging his high-energy, electron-beam vacuum now?
25
posted on
12/10/2010 3:27:40 PM PST
by
MIchaelTArchangel
(Obama makes me miss Jimmah Cahtah!)
To: dhs12345
I’m intrigued they think this occurs naturally around pulsars and neutron stars.
To: LibWhacker
Due to gravitation? Do they include gravitation in their “vacuum” models?
27
posted on
12/10/2010 3:32:37 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: count-your-change
It is all probabilities.
This stuff is pretty abstract. It is all pure math proven by experiment and inference, and new theories.... etc. Gets more and more obscure every time.
One thing that seems to hold up: the conservation law.
Wonder if we are creating this minute universe out of our own minds? Sort of the Schrödinger model on a large scale.
28
posted on
12/10/2010 3:41:29 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: LibWhacker
As Christine has repeatedly said, “The brane theory breaks down at the quantum level when considering the fecundity of the electron for producing other wave/particles”. —Christine O’Donnell
29
posted on
12/10/2010 3:45:18 PM PST
by
HospiceNurse
(Draft O'Donnell 4 President)
To: LibWhacker
To: epithermal
Just like there actually is only one Holiday fruitcake....
31
posted on
12/10/2010 4:27:55 PM PST
by
mikrofon
(Pi, to 8 slices)
To: mikrofon
BWHAHAHA - I hope its not my turn to receive it!
To: dhs12345
Hmmm...An interesting thought indeed. John Wheeler said that the observer always became part of the experiment so that the very act of observation affected the outcome.
Schrodinger’s cat ain’t nothin’ til we open the box and look at it.
33
posted on
12/10/2010 6:47:04 PM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Thanks LibWhacker! Not exactly on topic, but most likely of interest.
34
posted on
12/10/2010 7:10:59 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: Fred Nerks; Swordmaker; wendy1946; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; ...
Thanks LibWhacker! Some Electric Universe interest, among other things.
35
posted on
12/10/2010 7:11:01 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
New work at the University of Michigan, now written up in Physical Review Letters, discusses the possibility of producing matter and antimatter from the vacuum. The idea is that a high-energy electron beam combined with an intense laser pulse can pull matter and antimatter components out of the vacuum, creating a cascade of additional particles and anti-particles. UM Engineering research scientist Igor Sokolov has this to say about the theoretical study:
"We can now calculate how, from a single electron, several hundred particles can be produced. We believe this happens in nature near pulsars and neutron stars..."
Thanks LibWhacker!
· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·
36
posted on
12/10/2010 7:11:27 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: dhs12345
There is no such thing as photons; only darkons.
37
posted on
12/10/2010 7:19:58 PM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
(V for Vendetta.)
To: dhs12345
Due to gravitation? Yes, I'm guessing, indirectly due to gravity. I haven't even begun trying to read the paper, and don't think I will (my math just isn't good enough), but the article says their method involves a "high-energy electron beam combined with an intense laser pulse." Pulsars and neutron stars produce something like that in the form of intense jets of material and radiation that erupt from opposite poles of the star.
Now, whether or not they include gravitation in their models in a more substantive way, I can't say. It'd be fantastic if they do. I'd love to see that even if 99% of it went right over my head, as I'm sure it would! :-)
To: LibWhacker
The most important discovery of all time was the wheel...
To: SunkenCiv
String theory is an attempt to prove that it actually is possible to construct a theory stupider than evolution.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson