sent to me by the NY STATE Rifle and Pistol Assn.....
a MUST SEE VIDEO IF YOU TRAVEL BY AIR.
1 posted on
12/01/2010 12:16:59 PM PST by
Vaquero
Placemark for home viewing.
2 posted on
12/01/2010 12:19:31 PM PST by
IYAS9YAS
(Liberalism can be summed up thusly: someone craps their pants and we all have to wear diapers)
To: Vaquero
2 separate chemicals - still separated - do not produce a scent that would set off one dog. The explosives you are being screened for are not explosive when brought onto the airplane. They are combined after they are on the plane and the plane is in mid air. I’m not in favor of the TSA even existing, but I do see what they are doing and why they are doing it. Ever consider they have specific intelligence as to a real and present threat? I’m not saying they do, but MAYBE they do...
To: Vaquero
Dogs would be a good solution. They can be trained to spot almost anything, including certain behaviors.
But the middle eastern death cult that is responsible for terrorism HATES dogs. So in order not to offend them, and to sacrifice innocent Americans, we are not using dogs.
5 posted on
12/01/2010 12:33:53 PM PST by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(Liberalism is against human nature. Practicing liberalism is detrimental to your mental stability.)
To: Vaquero
Also with the added benefit of pissing off the muzzies, who do not like dogs. THAT alone, is worth the effort.
If you don’t like dogs, there’s a problem.
7 posted on
12/01/2010 12:51:52 PM PST by
pgobrien
(Obama couldn't lead people out of a burning building.....)
To: Vaquero
Two reasons why there are no K9 passenger searches at airports:
- Muslims regard dogs as unclean and would get their knickers in a twist
- Chertoff's porno scanner business is greasing Congressional and administration palms
10 posted on
12/01/2010 1:04:43 PM PST by
The Great RJ
(The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson