Posted on 11/30/2010 7:59:27 AM PST by Lucky9teen
GLENN: I want to go over the WikiLeaks and last hour I asked you, are you surprised by anything that is coming out of the WikiLeaks stories? Are you surprised that these documents show that China has helped Iran with a bomb? No. We told you that. Are you surprised that North Korea may have supplied a bomb to Iran? No. We told you they were doing that. Are you surprised that Putin is not a friend of the United States? No, you'd have to be a dead man. Are you surprised that we're in a really difficult situation with our, quote, ally Pakistan? Are you surprised that the major funder of Al Qaeda is Saudi Arabia? No, I'm not surprised by any of these. Are you? Is anyone in America surprised by these? So why is this coming out? Why is this coming out? If you look at the headline of the Drudge Report, it gives you a clue. Now, I understand that it's just the Drudge Report, but I think it's interesting that the headline is WikiLeaks turns on Obama. If you notice, there seems to be a gap here. There's no George Bush stuff, or very little. It's, most of it is Obama stuff. Turns on Obama. Who where did these documents come from? These documents came from a guy, Bradley Manning. He is apparently upset with I don't know his whole story. He was jilted by a boyfriend or something and... I don't know. But who's supporting him? And are there any connections to WikiLeaks, to spooky dude? Well, we spent the weekend having our researchers look into it. Yes, surprisingly enough. Let's take a look at who's supporting the guy who is releasing all of this and who's helping WikiLeaks. Who's involved? Are there any ties? And then maybe we'll answer the question, why is this coming out? We'll give you that here coming up in a second.
(OUT 10:16)
GLENN: So let's take a look here. Let's take a look at Bradley Manning supporters. This is the guy who actually got the documents to WikiLeaks. Code Pink. Code Pink, Code Pink. Wait a minute. Code Pink is related to Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and the whole anti Israel thing. Remember the flotilla? I believe Code Pink, doesn't Code Pink, can you look in? I think Code Pink gets money from Soros. Noam Chomsky, love Noam. You like Noam?
PAT: I've always loved Noam.
GLENN: He's wonderful. He's a communist. Michael Moore. Hmmm.
PAT: Hmmm.
GLENN: Then you have the Movement for Democratic Society. Now, what is the Movement for Democratic Society?
PAT: That must be good. It's got "Democratic" in it.
GLENN: It is. It's the adult counterpart of the Students for a Democratic Society. So it's like the Grey Panthers and the Black Panthers. The Grey Panthers are the old ones? Now, who's the guy who started SDS back in the 1960s? He's the guy who's now running the Open Society Institute for George Soros. Oh. So that's
PAT: Hmmm.
GLENN: That's good. WikiLeaks founders when they started to talk about the need to raise $5 million, they said the only ones that had this kind of money that could do what they were looking to do was the CIA or George Soros. And they complained that the original the initial round of publicity had, quote, affected our delicate negotiations with the Open Society Institute.
Now, I'm sure George Soros, because he's come out and he has said he is so against this WikiLeaks thing, he is so against it. Uh huh. WikiLeaks' advisory board member was a director of the China office of Human Rights Watch, which is Soros funded. Which the WikiLeaks editor, you know, he's hiding out in Great Britain, he's represented by attorney Mark Stevens, which is weird because Stevens also does pro bono work for the Open Society Institute. Isn't that weird? Huh. The Soros funded Kenya Human Rights Commission published an award winning WikiLeaks report and its editor, one Julian Assange, won the Amnesty International 2009 media award for the report Cry of Blood, and Soros should know something about the Cry of Blood. Soros, of course, funded the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights. So we have that going for us.
So now what am I alleging here? Well, I remind you of the, what is it, 1945 or '46 uprising in Czechoslovakia where the people at the top had a different agenda and they infiltrated the government of Czechoslovakia. They were communists and they infiltrated. And then unbeknownst to the average person they orchestrated all kinds of events on the ground, caused chaos, and had people to cry out to the government who they thought were on their side. "You've got to stop the madness." It's bottom up, top down and inside out. It is the theory that Van Jones, who George Soros has courted since his time in Oakland, he has paid for every step of the way, Van Jones. Van Jones is a George Soros operative. And quite frankly probably the one with the brightest future. Top down, bottom up, inside out.
What are people saying right now? Can't we stop these people? Can't we stop these people? How do we stop WikiLeaks? So the people are crying out, stop the release of this information. But you'll notice that the information isn't surprising. It's all information you already knew. And it verifies that your government is lying to you, which gives you two things. One, a distrust of government, which we showed you in the Soros special is, what, Step Number 3 or Step Number 4? Make sure people don't trust the government. Well, there you go. Now you don't trust the government to tell you the truth. Why? Because they're lying to you. But now you have verification that they're lying to you. And at the same time you have people crying out, can't we stop these people? Hmmm. So the bottom rises up and people cry out, can't we stop them, and the top, of course, is there to make sure things like this just don't happen for your protection. I'm sorry, I don't agree with WikiLeaks and I don't agree with Julian Assange. I don't, I don't think these are good guys. But so far all they have done is release the fact that your government has been lying to you. Not surprising. I haven't seen names of people. That's what concerns me, operatives. I think this is extraordinarily dangerous. But I reserve my right to cry out for them being shut down on put into jail, for a government that I do trust. I'm sorry I'm unwilling when I've got a government shutting down websites for Prada purses but they won't shut this one down. They will shut the Prada purses down on the same weekend that they are frisking grandma at the airport and yet they still won't recognize that there are people who are Islamic and crazy and want to kill us. They won't recognize that.
Our president has talked about Republicans, conservatives and tea parties as being the enemies. Hmmm. No, I don't, I don't think I trust him or anyone around him to bring the top down and silence people, especially since it's coincidentally the week that the FCC is deciding whether or not they are going to help in Net neutrality, which would regulate the Internet. Oh, that will be helpful. And Howard Dean is talking about how MSNBC and Fox should be curtailed. Again, what did I say? They will gladly throw MSNBC to the wolves because they have already played their role. They are no longer useful to them. So they will discard them. They are also being sold to another channel, and you know that any businessman is going to look at that model and say you've practically destroyed NBC. So sorry, guys, we have to reset. So, of course, they'll throw that one. "You know what? We'll give you MSNBC. You just give us Fox." No, I don't think that's a fair trade. No. Sorry. Back in a minute.
Damn that evil SOB.
Glenn Beck: It’s all a conspiracy, this is the death of America, we’re all going to die!!!! (queue the tears).
Its important to note that too many are going after the wrong target. (Assange)
Like it or not, this is a free speech issue and the real criminals are those who gave Assange the info in the first place. You can lock him up or kill him but the leaks will continue.
Just like a democrat. You don’t have the manhood to tell us what’s wrong with the message so you launch into childish personal attacks.
Yeh...mock if you will. But can you dispute what he’s saying?
How much has to come true before you believe his “conspiracies”?
He is old he will die in the not to distant future. May his ideas die with him.
Soros made all his coin on inside information.
The insiders who made him, can make another.
“Just like a democrat. ... so you launch into childish personal attacks.”
You may want to look up hypocrisy?
The message is fine, but how can you watch that man day after day? It’s not the message, it’s the drama queen delivery. But that works for you, apparently.
Enjoy.
Too many people like to dismiss Beck as a doom & gloom guy, but he’s been right on, over & over & over.
When Sorois dies, a tremendous void of power will appear. In the subsequent battle for that power things may get worse.
Maybe I’ve watched the Godfather too many times.
*** How much has to come true before you believe his “conspiracies”? ***
I give him credit for being out in front of a lot. But I reject his crying little girl presentation. A presentation worthy of mocking.
I like it when he predicts horrible things that will happen, but then prays that he’s wrong so the world won’t really end.
I hope you are talking about Soros (and not Beck) ;)
You know he has 2 sons...who plan on succeeding where he has left off?
Glen Beck is not perfect, he misses the mark like us all.
If it were not for guys like Rush, Glen, Drudge, we'd get nothing but the liberal/socialist slant. Period.
Be assured youngins, there is a civil civil war being waged as we blog.
While I agree Beck can be a bit over dramatic....I personally think it’s good to see a grown man cry (once in a while) over what has happened to a country he obviously loves dearly.
Meanwhile, he’s crying all the way to the bank... Capitalism works for his little girl presentation.
It’s hard to keep secrets these days. Secrets that provide strategic advantage should be more closely guarded. But the recent leaks do seem more like confirmation of stuff we already knew. The reason these are called damaging is because the analysts are stating the truth in their memos and then the government is formulating its official story, which is often the opposite of the truth. So it comes across as an embarrassment. Maybe if the State Department showed some balls and came out publicly to condemn the Saudis or Pakistan or Russia based on evidence and reason instead of their usual BS diplomicized rhetoric we’d command more respect wouldn’t risk a collapsing house of cards. And we wouldn’t be wasting time now apologizing to the world again, they’d already know where we stand.
Personally, I think a lot of people don’t like the fact that Glenn points out that we’re being used or herded.
In the case of wikileaks, the leaks themselves are relatively minor things that we knew or suspected anyway. The true goal is to create anger and division as well as a call for government to control us better.
Julian Assange has done what journalists routinely do in releasing things he shouldn’t have released and people are calling for his head instead of those who leaked the info to him. Now Assange says he will leak info on big banks.
Usefull idiots doesn’t apply to the left alone and this stuff is right out of the marxist playbook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.